Tinjauan Yuridis Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Harta Bersama yang Dibuat Oleh Suami Istri Setelah Perkawinan Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015

Abstract

A marriage is a commitment between two people, in this case a man and woman, with material purpose to build a happy and everlasting family (household) based on Belief in the one and only God which is the first principle of Pancasila(Five Principles). Asset/property issue may arise due to marriage. The development of society’s mindset lead them to enter into a prenuptial agreement before they get married considering that both husband and wife are able to earn asset/property. Besides that, there are many other reasons to enter into a prenuptial agreement. Basically there is no mixture of wealth in marriage between husband and wife. The bconcept of shared assets originally came from customsnor traditions that developed in indonesia. This concept is then suported by islamic law and positive laws that apply in our country. Then a joint proprty agreement was made. Prenuptial Agreement is an agreement which is made by two people (betrothed couple) before they get married. Prenuptial Agreement had been stipulated in Article 29 Law No. 1 of 1974. However, since the Constitutional Court issued the Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Prenuptial Agreement has several modifications which are presently being pros and cons in society. The matter which is being researched in this thesis is: what is the legal consequence of a prenuptial agreement which is made after marriage and based on the Decision of Constitutional Court No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The approach method which is used herein is normative legal research. The law material sources are primary law material and secondary law material in form of books and Legislation. Data analyses used in this research are processing and analyzing the data qualitatively andthen descriptively drawn up. The result of this research found the differences between Prenuptial Agreement which is stipulated in Article 29 Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Prenuptial Agreement which is stipulated in the Decision of Constitutional Court No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Bank pada Perjanjian Kawin dalam Perkawinan Campuran

“…Surat Permohonan yang diaj ukan Nyonya Ike Farida tertanggal 11 Mei 2015 menjadi sebuah solusi baru di Indonesia bagi pasangan suami isteri dalam perkawinan campuran namun belum membuat Perjanjian Kawin sebelum perkawinan berlangsung. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XII/2015 telah membuka kesempatan untuk membuat perjanjian kawin, tidak hanya sebelum perkawinan terjadi tetapi juga dapat dilakukan pada saat perkawinan berlangsung (Hariss & Kasmara, 2019). Sebelum adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XII/2015 ini, warga negara Indonesia (WNI) dapat kehilangan hak tertinggi dan terpenuhinya sebagai WNI, yaitu hak memiliki properti di Indonesia apabila tidak membuat perjanjian kawin dalam jangka waktu tertentu.…”

“…Implikasi perjanjian kawin terhadap harta dalam perkawinan campur juga telah diungkap dalam kajian ilmiah (Situmeang, 2019). Selain itu, akibat hukum perjanjian harta bersama yang dibuat oleh suami istri setelah perkawinan berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 juga pernah ditelaah dalam sebuah kajian ilmiah (Hariss & Kasmara, 2019).…”