2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of surgery for hip fractures: A systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
200
4
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
13
200
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effect of this delay on patient mortality is controversial and variations across studies may depend on failure to adjust for confounding variables or on the adjustment for different variables [16]. Our study contributes additional evidence to this ongoing debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the effect of this delay on patient mortality is controversial and variations across studies may depend on failure to adjust for confounding variables or on the adjustment for different variables [16]. Our study contributes additional evidence to this ongoing debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Lastly, a systematic review of 52 published studies failed to identify a clear relationship between timing of surgery and mortality rate, but suggested that a procedure performed within 48 hours of the fracture event can shorten hospital stay and decrease the complication rate [16]. A recent study showed that time from hospital admission to surgery can be reliably used as a surrogate of the actual time from fracture to surgery when studying hip fracture mortality [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 A systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291 143 patients was recently performed by Khan et al They observed that when studies adjusted for confounding factors, they were less likely to report improved survival outcomes from early surgery. 17 When Vidán et al controlled for additional variables such as older age, dementia, and chronic comorbidities, they found that delaying surgery up to 5 days had no influence on mortality. 18 Based on their results, the authors concluded that patients with a poorer baseline health status underwent more delayed surgery and that this association alone accounted for the poorer outcomes in patients who had delays.…”
Section: Surgical Timing and Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, surgery was postponed until patients had recovered from any acute illness and were deemed 'fit' for anaesthesia and surgery, resulting in pre-operative delay. There is now very strong evidence that delay from hospital admission to surgery increases mortality, lengthens hospital stay and delays functional recovery [67,68]. Delays normally relate to either organisational (51%) or medical (44%) problems, both of which are amenable to managed reduction [69].…”
Section: Pre-operative Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%