2019
DOI: 10.1002/art.41091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of Elevations of Autoantibody Isotypes Prior to Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract: Objective To evaluate patterns of elevations of isotypes of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti–citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) pre–rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis and post–RA diagnosis. Methods Using the Department of Defense Serum Repository we identified 214 RA cases and 210 matched controls. Up to 3 pre–RA diagnosis and 1 post–RA diagnosis serum samples per subject were tested for RF and for IgA, IgG, and IgM ACPAs. The timing and trajectories of elevations of autoantibodies were evaluated. Result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we have shown for the first time that IgG and IgA anti‐MAA autoantibodies are elevated prior to RA diagnosis. Importantly, this work, coupled with prior efforts by our group (7), demonstrates that anti‐MAA antibodies appear later in the preclinical course than ACPA or RF. Moreover, differences in prediagnosis concentrations of IgG and IgA anti‐MAA antibodies were more pronounced in ACPA‐positive patients compared to ACPA‐negative patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we have shown for the first time that IgG and IgA anti‐MAA autoantibodies are elevated prior to RA diagnosis. Importantly, this work, coupled with prior efforts by our group (7), demonstrates that anti‐MAA antibodies appear later in the preclinical course than ACPA or RF. Moreover, differences in prediagnosis concentrations of IgG and IgA anti‐MAA antibodies were more pronounced in ACPA‐positive patients compared to ACPA‐negative patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Anti‐MAA antibody concentrations were log 2 ‐transformed for further analyses. As was recently reported for ACPA and RF (7), the relative timing of elevations in anti‐MAA antibody concentrations was explored using separate mixed models for each isotype. In these models, the isotype was the dependent variable, RA status was the independent variable, random subject intercepts and slopes were assumed to have multivariate normal distributions, and time was a continuous covariate modeled using cubic B‐splines that were allowed to vary by group with internal knots placed at tertiles and boundary knots placed at extremes (8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we lack support for this interpretation given the cross-sectional nature of our sample collections. In addition, the studies of preclinical RA samples have been discordant in the order of antibody appearance: IgA RF and IgM RF were the first antibodies in a Swedish cohort 55 , whereas ACPA 4 and ACarPA 56 preceded IgM RF in a Dutch cohort, and again IgG ACPA preceded RF (no ACarPA analysis included) in American military 57 . Similarly, the presence of RF in smokers without RA that has been known for more than two decades 49,50 , cannot be taken as evidence of RF preceding the other autoantibodies because recent studies have found also an increased presence of ACPA in smokers without RA 20,58 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arleevskaya et al demonstrated that rates of respiratory tract infections were increased in individuals during an interval prior to their development of RA above that in controls. In addition, Kelmenson et al demonstrated in a cohort of 214 subjects with pre‐ and post‐RA diagnosis serum samples that the IgA isotype of ACPA significantly increased in positivity during a time period immediately prior to and shortly after the clinical diagnosis of RA, while IgG‐ACPA positivity remained stable. While this finding does not directly implicate the lung, it does suggest that IgA‐dominant mucosal processes likely help drive the transition to clinically apparent IA.…”
Section: The Lung In Pre‐ramentioning
confidence: 99%