2019
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of delivery in women with diabetes: A population‐based study

Abstract: Introduction Women with diabetes, and their infants, have an increased risk of adverse events due to excess fetal growth. Earlier delivery, when fetuses are smaller, may reduce these risks. This study aimed to evaluate the week‐specific risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity/mortality to assist with obstetrical decision making. Material and methods In this population‐based cohort study, women with type 1 diabetes (n = 5889), type 2 diabetes (n = 9422) and gestational diabetes (n = 138 917) and a comparison g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that neonatal morbidity did not appear to be higher at 39 weeks as compared with 40 weeks, the authors suggested that 39 weeks may be the best timing There is insufficient evidence on timing of delivery for women with pregestational diabetes. A recent populationbased study [33] further supported delivery at 38, 39, or 40 weeks of gestation for women with diabetes. The authors found no maternal benefit and little or no additional neonatal benefit for scheduled delivery at 39 rather than 38 weeks of gestation for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that neonatal morbidity did not appear to be higher at 39 weeks as compared with 40 weeks, the authors suggested that 39 weeks may be the best timing There is insufficient evidence on timing of delivery for women with pregestational diabetes. A recent populationbased study [33] further supported delivery at 38, 39, or 40 weeks of gestation for women with diabetes. The authors found no maternal benefit and little or no additional neonatal benefit for scheduled delivery at 39 rather than 38 weeks of gestation for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more strength is the fact that we analyzed both maternal and infant complications. This is particularly important, as often, in obstetric decision-making benefits for the infant may increase the chance of harm to the mother, and vice versa [33].…”
Section: Authority Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Важным фактором, определяющим состояние новорожденных, является оперативное родоразрешение и метод анестезиологического обеспечения. Неблагоприятное влияние компонентов различных методов анестезии на гомеостаз беременной, различная эффективность по купированию операционного стресса и влияние на углеводный обмен диктуют необходимость исследования данной медицинской проблемы с целю определения оптимального метода анестезии, обеспечивающего наиболее благоприятные условия для сохранения здоровья новорожденных при операции кесарева сечения у беременных с сахарным диабетом 1-го типа [2,3,8].…”
Section: ______________________ Abstract ____________________________...unclassified
“…Nowadays, due to new treatment options and substantially improved diabetic control there is a continuous increase of women with type 1 diabetes getting pregnant, reaching term and delivering healthy newborns. Although complications decreased, C-Sections (CS) rates remain high, exceeding 60% [1][2][3][4][5]. As a vaginal delivery is the most desired birth experience in the vast majority of women, this obvious disproportion compared to healthy non-diabetic women is extremely relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide guidelines for women with pregestational diabetes recommend delivery at 38 to 40 weeks of gestation to prevent the risk of macrosomia and still birth. This management results in a high number of women who undergo induction of labor (IOL) [ 1 , 4 ]. IOL is controversially discussed as a potential risk factor for emergency CSs [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%