2003
DOI: 10.2981/wlb.2003.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and distance of natal dispersal for wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden

Abstract: In order to estimate age at natal dispersal and dispersal distance, wild boars Sus scrofa were studied in Sweden by use of mark-recapture and telemetry. To de scribe the average natal dispersal in the population, we applied a sigmoid re gression model to analyse the age specific distance to the natal site. We used the first and second order derivatives of the model to determine at which ave rage age dispersal begins, reaches its maximum rate and ceases. The average dispersal distance was estimated by the maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that exposure of wild boar to MTC is consistent with TB outbreaks in cattle, especially when interpreting optical density with the 0.5 threshold. Moreover, using this threshold, the mean (median, respectively) distance between a seropositive wild boar and the nearest cattle outbreak is 13 km (12 km) which is compatible with the daily movement capacities of a wild boar (from 1 to 16 km, [28]) or their dispersal distances (4.90+/−5.65 km for males, reaching 38km for some individuals, in [29]; 16.6 km for males, in [30]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Our results show that exposure of wild boar to MTC is consistent with TB outbreaks in cattle, especially when interpreting optical density with the 0.5 threshold. Moreover, using this threshold, the mean (median, respectively) distance between a seropositive wild boar and the nearest cattle outbreak is 13 km (12 km) which is compatible with the daily movement capacities of a wild boar (from 1 to 16 km, [28]) or their dispersal distances (4.90+/−5.65 km for males, reaching 38km for some individuals, in [29]; 16.6 km for males, in [30]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Social bonds between related females have been demonstrated to have a positive effect on female fitness, including increased offspring survival, in other group-living species [65][68]. In contrast to females, wild boar males, particularly adults, tended to form associations with unrelated males which seems to conform with polygynous mating system and male-biased dispersal in this species [21], [22]. However, given the low number of adult males in this study and the potential bias in relatedness estimates [24], [25], this result should be treated with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The sensitivity of survival of juvenile males to environmental conditions and their low survival as yearlings might be linked to different dispersal patterns of the sexes. Male wild boars disperse further than females (Truvé and Lemel 2003), and the disruption of family links of male yearlings during the rut is considered final (Beuerle 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%