2014
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timely Versus Delayed Early Childhood Vaccination and Seizures

Abstract: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Reasons for childhood immunization delay include parental intent and barriers such as transportation. To date there has been 1 study of the association of delayed vaccination and seizures, which found measlesmumps-rubella and measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccines are both associated with a higher rate of seizures if received after 15 months of age.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Our study found no association between the timing of vaccination and occurrence of seizures in the first year … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study further confirmed (by using previously unanalyzed data) that MMRV and MMR + V are both associated with fever and seizure 7 to 10 days after vaccination, and validated our previous findings and those of others that MMRV versus MMR + V is associated with an excess risk of seizures 7 to 10 days after vaccination. 19,20,[34][35][36] This study replicated previously reported safety findings, which provides additional reassurance that assessing the 7 main outcomes with this approach was reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This study further confirmed (by using previously unanalyzed data) that MMRV and MMR + V are both associated with fever and seizure 7 to 10 days after vaccination, and validated our previous findings and those of others that MMRV versus MMR + V is associated with an excess risk of seizures 7 to 10 days after vaccination. 19,20,[34][35][36] This study replicated previously reported safety findings, which provides additional reassurance that assessing the 7 main outcomes with this approach was reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…12,32 This is concerning as selective or delayed immunization schedules do not have an equivalent safety profile to complete immunization. 47,48 Additionally, parents who intentionally omit or delay immunizations are significantly less likely to have received all scheduled immunizations by 19 months of age leading them to be less protected. 49 The long-term impact of selective schedules on herd immunity is also unknown.…”
Section: Selective Immunization Schedulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in a randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh, administration of inactivated influenza vaccine in the third trimester of pregnancy was associated with reduction of confirmed influenza (using rapid ELISA test) by 63% among infants younger than 6 months of age [13]. Maternal influenza immunization has also been associated with protection against adverse birth outcomes such as prematurity and small for gestational age birth in observational studies and post-hoc analyses of trial data [3,14], although this finding has not been consistently observed by others [15] (particularly in studies that do not account for influenza infection/circulation). Consequently, whereas these advances are promising, many questions remain.…”
Section: Rationale For Conducting Maternal Influenza Immunization Trialsmentioning
confidence: 90%