1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(96)06298-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timeliness of automated routine laboratory tests: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 653 institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that results were available sooner in non-teaching than teaching and in smaller rather than larger institutions. 9 The figures in delay of TAT available in the literature from the western world are quiet high as in our figures. The management of the section, regular quality assurance, meeting with the technical staff and strict vigilance are required in our setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that results were available sooner in non-teaching than teaching and in smaller rather than larger institutions. 9 The figures in delay of TAT available in the literature from the western world are quiet high as in our figures. The management of the section, regular quality assurance, meeting with the technical staff and strict vigilance are required in our setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It has also been shown that outcomes in certain situations such as operation theaters and in emergency departments have been affected by timely reporting of lab tests results. 4 Hence, rapid laboratory turnaround times is important both from a medical and commercial point of view. The study was conducted to evaluate the delay and reasons of delay of turnaround time (TAT) of stat tests in the section of clinical chemistry of the clinical laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly, staff shortages found to be associated with long TAT as a result of delay in the test ordering and collection [15]. In contrast, a study performed in 653 institutions, participating in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes program, for inpatients early morning routine clinical laboratory tests and found little evidence that longer routine test TAT affects patient length of stay [16]. On the other hand, faster TAT does not necessarily improving patient outcome as reported at Howanitz's study [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also little evidence that hospital length of stay is affected by laboratory turnaround time for routine testing in inpatients. 16 Although there is conflicting evidence as to the influence laboratory turnaround time has on length of stay, it seems that failure to meet stat turnaround time expectations will often lead to various forms of near-patient testing, such as point-of-care testing or a satellite stat laboratory in the ED. Such approaches increase costs through duplication of equipment and duplication of personnel.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%