TimeCap: Methodology for Comparing IT Infrastructures Based on Time and Capacity Metrics

Abstract

Abstract-Scientific community is one of the major driving forces for developing and utilizing IT technologies such as Supercomputers and Grid. Although, the main race has always been for bigger and faster infrastructures, an easier access to such infrastructures in recent years created a demand for more customizable and scalable environments. However, introducing new technologies and paradigms such as Cloud computing requires a comprehensive analysis of its benefits before the actual implementation.In this paper we introduce the TimeCap, a methodology for comparing IT infrastructures based on time requirements and resource capacity wastage. We go beyond comparing just the execution time by introducing the Time Complexity as part of TimeCap, a methodology used for comparing arbitrary time related tasks required for completing a procedure, i.e., obtaining the scientific results. Moreover, a resource capacity wastage is compared using the Discrete Capacity, a second methodology as part of TimeCap used for analyzing resource assignment and utilization. We evaluate our methodology by comparing a traditional physical infrastructure and a Cloud infrastructure using our local IT resources. We use a real world scientific application for calculating plasma instabilities for analyzing time and capacity required for computation.

Cloud Computing

“…Although virtualization technology can improve resource utilization [Mastelic and Brandic 2013], it also consumes resources and thus creates an energy consumption overhead, mostly through a hypervisor [Jin et al 2012]. As reported in Jin et al…”

“…Similarly, Borgetto et al [2012a] proposed several means to sort the servers and the VM for the mapping phase, using several sorts of best-fit and first-fit algorithms together with an ad-hoc algorithm derived from vector packing. In Barbagallo et al [2010], the authors use bio-inspired heuristics to find the most energy-efficient hosts, whereas Mazzucco et al [2010] propose to maximize revenues in a cloud by turning on and off physical machines.…”

Energy Efficiency for Ultrascale Systems: Challenges and Trends from Nesus Project

“…Virtualization technology provides an additional infrastructure layer on top of which multiple VMs can be deployed. Virtualization technology can improve resource utilization, but it also consumes resources and thus creates an energy consumption overhead [59] -mostly through a hypervisor. As reported in [50], a hypervisor based on full virtualization, i.e., KVM , creates much higher overhead (11.6%) than one based on paravirtualization (0,47%), such as Xen, as opposed to using physical machines.…”