2020
DOI: 10.1111/hojo.12352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Well Spent: Misery, Meaning, and the Opportunity of Incarceration

Abstract: People often leave prison worse than when they arrived; sometimes, they leave the same. People could leave prison better than when they arrived through a reimagined response to crime. They could be set up to live sustainable, fulfilling, and meaningful lives after prison. This approach could be informed by research on what makes for a meaningful life – regardless of whether a person has come into contact with the criminal justice system. A reimagined corrections could view time spent in prison as an opportunit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we find that some people decrease in criminal activity after confinement, whereas fewer increase and most stay about the same (see also Frisch, 2018). Our findings that confinement can be a setting for change supports the call for incarceration to be “time well spent” (Wright, 2020). Confinement should provide opportunities for individuals to change and grow—as well as signal that change and growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, we find that some people decrease in criminal activity after confinement, whereas fewer increase and most stay about the same (see also Frisch, 2018). Our findings that confinement can be a setting for change supports the call for incarceration to be “time well spent” (Wright, 2020). Confinement should provide opportunities for individuals to change and grow—as well as signal that change and growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These employment barriers are costly because quality work not only reduces recidivism but also is vital for financial independence and accessing housing and healthcare absent of government and familial supports (Laub & Sampson, 2003; Silva, 2012). Prison credentials—prison program certificates and work experiences—are proposed as one solution to counter the negative mark of a prison record by signaling criminal desistance and employability (Bushway & Apel, 2012; Duwe & Henry‐Nickie, 2021; Lee & Stohr, 2012; McNeill, 2015; Wright, 2020). Yet, the efficacy of prison credentials on employment outcomes is mixed (Davis et al., 2013; Duwe, 2017; Duwe & Henry‐Nickie, 2021; Latessa, 2020; Latessa et al., 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than signal criminal desistance and employability, the prison credential dilemma considers the possibility of prison credentials sending contradictory information about applicants, which employers may interpret in numerous ways. Employers may interpret prison credentials as criminal desistance and employability signals (Bushway & Apel, 2012; Collins, 1979; Wright, 2020), resulting in positive postprison labor market outcomes as intended. Prison credentials, however, can also indicate applicants’ incarceration histories (Pager, 2003; Sugie et al., 2020), especially if employers do not recognize them as desistance and employability signals (Connelly et al., 2011; Densley & Pyrooz, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the RNR model is the leading correctional treatment paradigm in the United States, while the GLM is mostly considered complementary to RNR (Cullen, 2012). However, recent proposals envision a more meaningful integration of the two models that moves correctional rehabilitation beyond the RNR‐GLM debate (Ziv, 2018; see also; Wright, 2020).…”
Section: Correctional Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%