2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2014.2334296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Varying Compensation for Peak Current-Controlled PFC Boost Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a self-compensation technique was proposed in [27], which can provide a more accurate current limiting capacity and does not require an external slope generator. In [28], a time-varying ramp compensation technique was presented to eliminate the fast-scale instability of a PCM-controlled power factor correction (PFC) boost converter. In [29], adaptive ramp compensation was proposed to improve the robustness of the conventional ramp compensation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a self-compensation technique was proposed in [27], which can provide a more accurate current limiting capacity and does not require an external slope generator. In [28], a time-varying ramp compensation technique was presented to eliminate the fast-scale instability of a PCM-controlled power factor correction (PFC) boost converter. In [29], adaptive ramp compensation was proposed to improve the robustness of the conventional ramp compensation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the converter may operate in the discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) due to variation in onload parameter, which is discussed in [6], [7]. Due to this DCM feature during reduced loading, dead-zone arises close to the zero-current crossing and this results crossover distortion and fast scale instability [8]. Furthermore, this restrains property execrably sluggish dynamic response in converter system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henceforth, many control techniques have been developed in recent years to limit the dead-zone close to the zero-crossing region, however, the dynamic performance of the converter under load fluctuation is not apparently deliberated. A timevarying compensation approach with the peak current control scheme is suggested in [8] to resolve fast scale instability due to zero-current dead-zone, whereas, transient loading state isnt considered in this to examine the dynamic performance of the system. Again, Sliding Mode Control (SMC) scheme is implemented to interleaved boost PFC system in [9] and a better solution is achieved to resolve the issue concerned to load variation, but the performance under light loading scenario is not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, the boost converter is commonly used in PFC applications [1]- [9]. For low power applications, the discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) and critical mode (CRM) operations are commonly used because of their zero current switching (ZCS) characteristic and easy implementation [10]- [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%