2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-002-0296-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time transfer using GPS carrier phase: error propagation and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Santerre, 1991;Dach et al, 2003;Kouba, 2005]. In combination with multipath effects and troposphere modeling errors, the amplification of observation errors through these pronounced correlations is one of the main limiting factors for accurate GNSS height determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santerre, 1991;Dach et al, 2003;Kouba, 2005]. In combination with multipath effects and troposphere modeling errors, the amplification of observation errors through these pronounced correlations is one of the main limiting factors for accurate GNSS height determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting large number of clock parameters are strongly correlated with troposphere Zenith Path Delays (ZPD) parameters and the station height (Dach et al 2003;Rothacher and Beutler 1998). It can be expected that, if the quality of the high-performance receiver clocks could be fully exploited with an appropriate deterministic and stochastic model, the solutions of other parameters, especially the kinematic station height estimates, should become more stable and more accurate because of the strong correlation between the clock parameters and the station height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiver delay should, however, be seriously considered for time-transfer (Ray and Senior 2002) and determination of ionospheric delay corrections for wide area differential GPS positioning. This is due to the facts that (1) the partial (or full) influence of the receiver hardware delay will be absorbed by the estimated receiver and satellite clock parameters (Dach et al 2003), which is one of the main error sources of time-transfer, and (2) to obtain accurate absolute ionospheric corrections from GPS data for wide area differential GPS positioning, the receiver delay values should be removed from the ionospheric measurements or estimated along with ionosphere parameters . Several studies have presented the behavior of L1/L2 interfrequency delays (or biases) using data from a network of multiple GPS reference stations such as IGS stations (Wilson and Mannucci 1993) or the Canadian Active Control System (Gao et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%