2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time to loading and locoregional control in perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy: The tumor bed effect revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brachytherapy has been shown to be a promising treatment modality in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer achieving excellent local control even in the unresectable setting to deliver curative doses [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Unlike EBRT, brachytherapy is able to deliver a high-localized dose with relative sparing of critical normal tissues due to rapid tissue falloff [ 22 ].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brachytherapy has been shown to be a promising treatment modality in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer achieving excellent local control even in the unresectable setting to deliver curative doses [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Unlike EBRT, brachytherapy is able to deliver a high-localized dose with relative sparing of critical normal tissues due to rapid tissue falloff [ 22 ].…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when brachytherapy is given to the surgical bed, an R1 resection was associated with worse local control than an R0 resection 88 ; a brachytherapy boost should not be used as a substitute for a margin‐negative resection. The timing of brachytherapy (whether before postoperative day five or after) did not seem to have a statistically significant impact on patients with newly diagnosed SCCHN 89 …”
Section: Topic 1: Summary Of Studies With Oncologic Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Studies with primary oncologic endpoints are shown in the Table S1 and included 11 systematic reviews, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] 24 randomized trials with four long-term updates, 19, 29 non-randomized clinical trials, [15][16][17][18] and nine post hoc analyses of randomized trials. [83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91] The randomized trials are presented in Table 4. Studies that focused on nononcologic endpoints are shown in the Table S2 and included two systematic reviews, 92,93 one randomized trial, 94 and 21 non-randomized clinical trials.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations