Systematic review of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria
Abstract:Background: The aims of this systematic review are to (a) evaluate the current literature on the impact of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes and (b) identify the optimal evidence-based postoperative therapy recommendations for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. Methods: An analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and M… Show more
“…4 Certain adverse pathologic features after surgical resection may warrant adjuvant treatment, and they include large tumor size, nodal disease, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and close margins (<5 mm). 26 , 27 , 28 Given limited data on adverse pathologic risk features for recurrent HNSCC after salvage surgery, the criteria for adverse pathologic risk features in an index cancer was also used for recurrent cancer or SPC to identify patients in our institution who would benefit from adjuvant re-RT. Because of an absence of any standardized guideline for adjuvant re-RT in this population, our institution's preferred adjuvant re-RT treatment is 60 to 66 Gy with the exact dose dependent on the prior RT treatment, the particular adverse histopathologic features, the patient's overall clinical status, and the physician's preference.…”
“…4 Certain adverse pathologic features after surgical resection may warrant adjuvant treatment, and they include large tumor size, nodal disease, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and close margins (<5 mm). 26 , 27 , 28 Given limited data on adverse pathologic risk features for recurrent HNSCC after salvage surgery, the criteria for adverse pathologic risk features in an index cancer was also used for recurrent cancer or SPC to identify patients in our institution who would benefit from adjuvant re-RT. Because of an absence of any standardized guideline for adjuvant re-RT in this population, our institution's preferred adjuvant re-RT treatment is 60 to 66 Gy with the exact dose dependent on the prior RT treatment, the particular adverse histopathologic features, the patient's overall clinical status, and the physician's preference.…”
“…Different reporting modalities for margin status among clinical trials represent a specific concern that could affect a clear understand of disease outcomes when comparing published studies. This consideration could produce subsequent controversies regarding the appropriate indication for postoperative approaches according to margin status [ 130 ]—in particular, limited consensus still exists on the appropriate RT fractionation regimen and radiation volumes [ 130 ].…”
When presenting with major pathological risk factors, adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for oral cavity cancers (OCC) is recommended, but the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (POCRT) when only minor pathological risk factors are present is controversial. A systematic review following the PICO-PRISMA methodology (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021267498) was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. Studies assessing outcomes of POCRT in patients with solely minor risk factors (perineural invasion or lymph vascular invasion; pN1 single; DOI ≥ 5 mm; close margin < 2–5 mm; node-positive level IV or V; pT3 or pT4; multiple lymph nodes without ENE) were evaluated. A meta-analysis technique with a single-arm study was performed. Radiotherapy was combined with chemotherapy in all studies. One study only included patients treated with POCRT. In the other 12 studies, patients were treated with only PORT (12,883 patients) and with POCRT (10,663 patients). Among the patients treated with POCRT, the pooled 3 year OS rate was 72.9% (95%CI: 65.5–79.2%); the pooled 3 year DFS was 70.9% (95%CI: 48.8–86.2%); and the pooled LRFS was 69.8% (95%CI: 46.1–86.1%). Results are in favor of POCRT in terms of OS but not significant for DFS and LRFS, probably due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and a combination of different prognostic factors.
“…An OS benefit of an alternative schedule of cisplatin administration of weekly 50 mg/m 2 added to PORT was also demonstrated for stage III/IV SCCHN with ENE; however, the LRC was not proven [83]. The Japanese group (JCOG 1008) trial also showed the non-inferiority of the alternative schedule weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 to three-weekly cisplatin in high-risk patients with microscopically positive margin and/or ENE [84]. In general, PORT should be commenced within 6 weeks after surgery [85].…”
Section: Multi-modality Approach In Locally Advanced Scchnmentioning
Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) is the most common cancer arising in the head and neck region. Smoking and heavy alcohol drinking are still the well-established causes of most cases worldwide; however, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the concerning cause in the Western world. The different pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and prognosis between HPV-driven and non-HPV SCCHN would lead to the different treatment approaches. Breakthroughs in radiation techniques, better organ-preserving surgical strategies, and multidisciplinary management modalities are the major reasons for the curability rate among patients with early and locally advanced SCCHN. Unfortunately, among patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic diseases, the treatment remains an area of need. Such patients usually die within a few years. The immune checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to provide astonishingly better survival, but only among a small and not definitely known proportion of patients. Investigating the more specific biomarkers predicting the treatment response and novel therapeutic options is warranted. In this review, we highlight the latest advances in pathophysiology, treatment, and the future direction of researches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.