Time to abandon the subjective–objective divide?

Abstract

“We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are” (Anaïs Nin, 1969)In the mental state examination, a standard method of describing the clinical encounter is to contrast the patient's supposedly ‘subjective’ account with the doctor's ‘objective’ description. In this model, the doctor is granted a privileged position: the clinician's perspective is taken to be superior to that of the patient. The doctor's objective approach is considered neutral, scientific and representing the truth of the matter. In contrast, the patient's subjective report is regarded as unreliable, distorted and potentially false. The lowly status of the subjective perspective is further emphasised by the frequent use of the accompanying prefix, merely.

Humanistic Testing and Assessment

“…And we consider the term objective in describing any psychological test using selfreport as an unfortunate misnomer. Furthermore, we believe, as do some others, that ultimately the distinctions between subjectivity and objectivity are based on a false dichotomy (e.g., Beveridge, 2002;Friedman, 2002b).…”