The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0764-4469(99)80043-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time sequence of cancer occurrence. Implications in low level radiation risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The husbandry conditions used in our studies were optimal as shown by the long lifespans of the WT mice used in these studies, e.g., the mean and maximum survivals of more than 30 and 40 months, respectively, which is as long if not longer than the lifespans of similar inbred mice reported by other laboratories, including the aging colony maintained by the NIA [11, 16]. For example, data published by Jackson's Laboratory show that C57B6 mice have a mean and maximal lifespans of 27 and 40 months, respectively (mean lifespan approximately 3 months shorter compared to our data) [60, 61]. However, the comparisons of others parameters such as food intake, body weight, fecundity and incidence of tumors, resulted to be similar to the data coming from our animal facility [60-62].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The husbandry conditions used in our studies were optimal as shown by the long lifespans of the WT mice used in these studies, e.g., the mean and maximum survivals of more than 30 and 40 months, respectively, which is as long if not longer than the lifespans of similar inbred mice reported by other laboratories, including the aging colony maintained by the NIA [11, 16]. For example, data published by Jackson's Laboratory show that C57B6 mice have a mean and maximal lifespans of 27 and 40 months, respectively (mean lifespan approximately 3 months shorter compared to our data) [60, 61]. However, the comparisons of others parameters such as food intake, body weight, fecundity and incidence of tumors, resulted to be similar to the data coming from our animal facility [60-62].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%