2015
DOI: 10.1115/1.4030325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Scale for Rapid Draining of a Surficial Lake Into the Greenland Ice Sheet

Abstract: A 2008 report by Das et al. documented the rapid drainage during summer 2006 of a supraglacial lake, of approximately 44 Â 10 6 m 3 , into the Greenland ice sheet over a time scale moderately longer than 1 hr. The lake had been instrumented to record the time-dependent fall of water level and the uplift of the ice nearby. Liquid water, denser than ice, was presumed to have descended through the sheet along a crevasse system and spread along the bed as a hydraulic facture. The event led two of the present autho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeled drainage rate of the lake is faster than the measured rate (Figure b), suggesting that the modeled blister also expands faster than it does in reality. Recent modeling by Rice et al [] suggests that creep opening of the englacial hydraulic fracture prior to rapid lake drainage produces a better match between measured and modeled lake drainage rates, but as we assume the lake hydrofracture opens only at the beginning of lake drainage, we do not include this process. The maximum uplift produced with the blister model is less than that seen by the GPS.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeled drainage rate of the lake is faster than the measured rate (Figure b), suggesting that the modeled blister also expands faster than it does in reality. Recent modeling by Rice et al [] suggests that creep opening of the englacial hydraulic fracture prior to rapid lake drainage produces a better match between measured and modeled lake drainage rates, but as we assume the lake hydrofracture opens only at the beginning of lake drainage, we do not include this process. The maximum uplift produced with the blister model is less than that seen by the GPS.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we make no attempt here to model the transport of melt water to the base of the glacier (see e.g. Rice et al (2015)), our model suggests that, in the presence of a poroelastic subglacial till, an initial, small, melt-water flux to the base may locally increase the pore-pressure within the till. After a characteristic time, summarised in table 1, this melt water flux is sufficient to lift the base of the ice sheet off the till, a point certainly concomitant with an enhancement of basal sliding.…”
Section: Geophysical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that Q(t) is simply a parameter in this model: we do not attempt to incorporate any description of how fluid propagates through the ice to its base (see, e.g. Rice et al 2015).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zero toughness limiting flow regime solutions presented here are also applicable in other contexts where the characteristic Reynolds number is truly large, such as in the case of rapid lake drainage at glacier beds (Rice et al. 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%