We very much appreciated both the letter from Marx et al. 1 regarding our recent article in the Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2 and the Editor's offering us an opportunity to respond. The observations by Marx et al 1 regarding apparent vasovagal syncope (VVS) events in children and adolescents tend, as they state, to be consistent with the potential role of epinephrine as a contributor to enhancing susceptibility to, and perhaps even being in part responsible for triggering, VVS events under conditions of emotional upset or stress. Additional indirect evidence favoring the "epinephrine rise" hypothesis is provided to some extent by the findings of the POST study in which beta-adrenergic blockade appeared to provide some therapeutic benefit. 3-5 The latter was, however, largely observed in older fainters 3-5 in whom a premonitory epinephrine rise has been documented, but is typically of a lesser magnitude than that observed in younger individuals. [3][4][5][6] In this regard, we have previously hypothesized that the more modest rise in epinephrine in "older" individuals (ie, >40 years) may permit sufficient therapeutic pharmacologic beta-adrenergic blockade and consequent amelioration of VVS susceptibility at tolerable betablocker doses, whereas the doses needed to achieve comparable benefit in more youthful subjects may not be acceptable. In any case, of course, our clinical model in both the current and prior studies was that of extended upright posture, and not that of emotional upset.The seeming pathophysiological similarity between head-up postureinduced VVS and VVS instigated by emotion is intriguing and has long been deemed clinically useful, but such concordance nonetheless remains speculative.Marx et al 1 raise the interesting issue that the unique VVS susceptibility exhibited by humans may tie into the epinephrine hypothesis. As they point out, we and others have commented previously on the seeming paradoxical persistence of VVS throughout the human evolutionary experience, while it is no longer (or perhaps never was) present in the vast majority of other species. [7][8][9] Even species such as giraffes and ostriches, in whom the brain is in a precarious position with respect to gravity, do not seem to be susceptible. Nevertheless, while it is useful for clinicians to equate the pathophysiology of head-up triggered VVS with VVS induced by fear, anxiety, physical pain, and so on, we must remain wary that we have yet to prove concordance. Such proof may be nearly impossible to obtain given the unpredictable nature of spontaneous VVS, but it is ultimately essential.Finally, Marx et al delicately point to the "subtle doubts" raised by Sutton and Fedorowski in their editorial commenting on our "epinephrine rise" concept. 10 In this regard, we certainly agree with the editorialists that the mystery of VVS is far from unraveling. With respect to the neurohumoral aspect alone, multiple researchers investigating this issue have correlated many neurohumoral associations with the development of VV...