In the present study population of children with atrial septal defects, 62% showed spontaneous closure (34%) or regression to < or = 3 mm (28%). Initial atrial septal defect diameter was the main predictor of spontaneous closure.

No abstract

Summary. Background: During cardiac catheterization (CC) in children, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used for primary prophylaxis of thrombotic events (TE). However, the optimal UFH dose to minimize TE and bleeding in children has yet to be established. Objectives: To (i) objectively assess the incidence of TE and bleeding during pediatric CC using clinical assessment and ultrasound; and (ii) compare a high-dose vs. low-dose UFH protocol for thromboprophylaxis. Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing high-dose UFH (100 units kg )1 bolus, followed by 20 units kg h )1 continuous infusion) vs. low-dose UFH (50 units kg )1 bolus) during CC.Outcome assessment was by clinical examination and vascular ultrasound, performed by blinded examiners before and within 48 h after CC. Children with no consent for randomization were followed in a cohort receiving standard-of-care UFH (parallel-cohort RCT). Results: A total of 227 children were included; 137 were randomized and 90 followed in the cohort study. The overall incidence of TE was 4.6% and bleeding 6.6%. The RCT was stopped early for futility as there were no differences between the high-dose and the low-dose UFH in TE (5% vs. 3%; risk ratios [RR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3; 9) and bleeding (7% vs. 12%, RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2; 2). There were also no differences when RCT and cohort study populations were combined. Conclusions: The incidences of TE and bleeding during CC in children were low. There were no differences between the high-dose and the low-dose UFH protocols studied. Although Heparin Anticoagulation Randomized Trial in Cardiac Catheterization (HEARTCAT) was not designed as non-inferiority trial, low-dose UFH (50 units kg )1 bolus) appears sufficient for thromboprophylaxis during CC.

No abstract

The incidence of central venous line-related deep venous thrombosis in children with short-term central venous lines is high and comparable to reports for children with long-term central venous lines. Sensitivities of venography, venous ultrasonography, and echocardiography in children vary depending on the affected venous segment. A combination of diagnostic tests is required for sensitive detection of central venous line-related deep venous thrombosis in the upper venous system.