2004
DOI: 10.24266/0738-2898-22.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time of Pruning Effects on Cold Hardiness of Butterfly Bush

Abstract: A study was conducted over a two-year period to determine how time of pruning affects cold hardiness of butterfly bush (Buddleia davidii (Franchet) ‘Royal Red’). Plants were pruned in November, January, or March, and pruned and non-pruned plants were exposed to six freezing temperatures two weeks after pruning treatments were applied. In addition, plants pruned in previous seasons were included in subsequent freezing treatments. Plants were rated for injury 2 or 3 weeks after treatment (WAT), and for mortality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enormous ornamental value of butterfl y bush has warranted its use in numerous research programs addressing production practices or landscape uses such as cultivar sensitivity to acute ozone (Findley et al, 1997), growth regulation during container production (Keever and Gilliam, 1994), effects of spacing on cut fl ower production (Armitage and Dirr, 1995), effects of dolomitic lime on growth and nutrient uptake (Gillman et al, 1998), effects of pruning time on cold hardiness (Warr et al, 2002), susceptibility to twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Gillman et al, 1999), and susceptibility to root-knot nematodes (Thetford and Kinloch, 2002). Butterfl y bush is listed as one of 10 woody landscape plants commonly damaged by rootknot nematodes in Florida (Crow and Dunn, 2002) and recent work by Thetford and Kinlock (2002) identifi ed 12 butterfl y bush taxa susceptible to the root knot nematodes Meloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita.…”
Section: Variety Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enormous ornamental value of butterfl y bush has warranted its use in numerous research programs addressing production practices or landscape uses such as cultivar sensitivity to acute ozone (Findley et al, 1997), growth regulation during container production (Keever and Gilliam, 1994), effects of spacing on cut fl ower production (Armitage and Dirr, 1995), effects of dolomitic lime on growth and nutrient uptake (Gillman et al, 1998), effects of pruning time on cold hardiness (Warr et al, 2002), susceptibility to twospotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Gillman et al, 1999), and susceptibility to root-knot nematodes (Thetford and Kinloch, 2002). Butterfl y bush is listed as one of 10 woody landscape plants commonly damaged by rootknot nematodes in Florida (Crow and Dunn, 2002) and recent work by Thetford and Kinlock (2002) identifi ed 12 butterfl y bush taxa susceptible to the root knot nematodes Meloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita.…”
Section: Variety Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%