2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time of day-dependent latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversions in rats*1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedure shows that animals tested in temporal contexts different from that of the conditioning acquire less aversion, which is similar to what has been consistently described by changing the spatial context (Boakes, Elliot, Swinbourne, & Westbrook, 1997;Bonardi, Honey, & Hall, 1990;Bouton, 1993;Bouton, Westbrook, Corcoran, & Maren, 2006;González, Garcia-Burgos, & Hall, 2012;Pearce & Bouton, 2001;Rosas & Bouton 1997). Similarly, the latent inhibition of CTA can be disrupted by changes in the time of day between preexposure and conditioning (Manrique et al, 2004;Molero et al, 2005). Nevertheless, the characteristics of the procedure that facilitate this temporal specificity of the latent inhibition (or dependency of latent inhibition on the temporal context-time of dayof preexposure and conditioning) are not entirely known.…”
Section: Taste Stimulus Restriction Temporal Contextsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This procedure shows that animals tested in temporal contexts different from that of the conditioning acquire less aversion, which is similar to what has been consistently described by changing the spatial context (Boakes, Elliot, Swinbourne, & Westbrook, 1997;Bonardi, Honey, & Hall, 1990;Bouton, 1993;Bouton, Westbrook, Corcoran, & Maren, 2006;González, Garcia-Burgos, & Hall, 2012;Pearce & Bouton, 2001;Rosas & Bouton 1997). Similarly, the latent inhibition of CTA can be disrupted by changes in the time of day between preexposure and conditioning (Manrique et al, 2004;Molero et al, 2005). Nevertheless, the characteristics of the procedure that facilitate this temporal specificity of the latent inhibition (or dependency of latent inhibition on the temporal context-time of dayof preexposure and conditioning) are not entirely known.…”
Section: Taste Stimulus Restriction Temporal Contextsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As context includes the time of day, and LI is sensitive to changes in this variable (e.g., Manrique, Molero, Ballesteros, Moron, Gallo, and Fenton, 2004), all experimental sessions were conducted starting at the same time each day (10:00 AM) to avoid any effect of temporal factors on LI.…”
Section: Methods Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in the table, the context combinations are complicated by the use of the animal's home cage as experimental context, and by the novelty or familiarity of the new context introduced at the corresponding stage. An inspection of the results reveals a complex pattern that is difficult to interpret, with similar context changes (as in the ABA condition) either inducing a reduction of LI (Manrique et al, 2004), unchanged LI (Chamizo, 1996;Moron et al, 2002) or even increased LI (Westbrook et al, 2000, Exp. 2). Table 1 about here…”
Section: Effects Of Context On Latent Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the influence of temporal context in associative processes is also a good model for understanding the mechanisms of learning and memory [133]. Regarding the modulating effect of time of day, we have shown in our laboratory that the time of day in the sleep/wake cycle acts as a contextual cue and modulates latent inhibition of taste aversion learning [134] and CTA retrieval [135].…”
Section: Effects Of Context On Taste Learningmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Temporal context dependency also seems to be mediated by the hippocampus in the paradigm of latent inhibition of taste aversion learning [147], as well as in CTA [14]. However, no studies have reported the role of the amygdala in the temporal modulation of taste learning [134,135]. It is possible that the amygdala is involved in CTA selectively but not in the phenomenon of latent inhibition in this paradigm, nor in the contextual dependency of this phenomenon.…”
Section: The Limbic System and The Effect Of Context On Ctamentioning
confidence: 99%