2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the effects of context change and context familiarity on Latent Inhibition with a Conditioned Taste Aversion procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How latent inhibition is influenced by context has been the subject of several studies but almost exclusively in the context of taste-aversion learning by rats. Some of those studies have found that using different environmental chambers between the pre-exposure and conditioning periods decreases the strength of latent inhibition of taste-aversion learning [9]. Others studies have reported findings similar to our study, where different timing between the pre-exposure and conditioning periods weakened latent inhibition [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How latent inhibition is influenced by context has been the subject of several studies but almost exclusively in the context of taste-aversion learning by rats. Some of those studies have found that using different environmental chambers between the pre-exposure and conditioning periods decreases the strength of latent inhibition of taste-aversion learning [9]. Others studies have reported findings similar to our study, where different timing between the pre-exposure and conditioning periods weakened latent inhibition [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…inhibit the learning of the stimulus as dangerous, a process known as 'latent inhibition' [8]. Demonstrating that latent inhibition has occurred first involves a 'pre-exposure' period when the animal is repeatedly exposed to the stimulus, followed by a 'conditioning' period when the stimulus is paired with an unconditioned stimulus [9]. Subsequently, a 'testing' period is used to determine whether the animal learned the stimulus as a threat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result supports the idea that the home cage context favors the establishment of a safe flavor memory trace [19,4]. However, the results do not allow us to identify whether the process responsible for the faster neophobia process is related to the mere familiarization that the animals have received during their long stay at the home cages, or if there exists an additional component that contributes to learned flavor safety.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Thus, when considering the role played by the animals´ home cages in latent inhibition experiments, De la Casa et al [19] proposed an explanation analogous to the learned safety theory by Rozin and Kalat [9,10] to explain the progressive reduction of conditioned taste aversion observed when the delay between the flavor (the CS) and the gastric malaise (the US) increases. More specifically, the learned safety theory suggests that any new flavor is considered potentially dangerous, but once the animal has consumed the flavor and there are no aversive consequences it is stored as a safe flavor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation