The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.104302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-local master equation connecting the Born and Markov approximations

Abstract: We present an exact expansion of the master equation for an open quantum system. The resulting equation is time local and enables us to calculate clearly defined higher-order corrections to the Born-Markov approximation. In particular, we show that non-Markovian terms are of the same order of magnitude as higher-order terms in the system-bath coupling. As a result, we emphasize that analyzing non-Markovian behavior of a system implies going beyond the Born approximation. Additionally, we address with this appr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38) are consistent with the numerical results shown in figure 3(b) (dashed-dotted-line) for asymmetrical coupling G = G as an example.We further consider the single level in the dot with spin-dependence as described by the Hamiltonian, The involved states in the dot are ñ |0 ,  ñ | ,  ñ | , and ñ º   ñ | | 2 denoting the empty, two single-occupation spin states, and the double-occupation spin-pair state, respectively. In this state-basis, we have = ñá  +  ñá  demonstrate the Coulomb interaction effect more transparently, we fix the dot level with spin-degeneracy, spin-independent coupling strength, G = G = G (a = L R , ).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38) are consistent with the numerical results shown in figure 3(b) (dashed-dotted-line) for asymmetrical coupling G = G as an example.We further consider the single level in the dot with spin-dependence as described by the Hamiltonian, The involved states in the dot are ñ |0 ,  ñ | ,  ñ | , and ñ º   ñ | | 2 denoting the empty, two single-occupation spin states, and the double-occupation spin-pair state, respectively. In this state-basis, we have = ñá  +  ñá  demonstrate the Coulomb interaction effect more transparently, we fix the dot level with spin-degeneracy, spin-independent coupling strength, G = G = G (a = L R , ).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Following the estimation of the order of magnitude of the self-energy in[38], we roughly get (see appendix C.2 for the detail) )ˆ¯(ˆ¯)]} {ˆ[ ( )ˆ¯(ˆ¯)]} ( )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain ρfalse(tfalse) in practice, one commonly first derives a kinetic or generalized master equation . Modeling the leads as reservoirs that are initially each in a grand‐canonical equilibrium state contained in ρ0lead, and furthermore assuming no initial system‐environment correlations, ρ0tot=ρ0·ρ0lead, the relaxation dynamics for any time t>0 is described by the quantum kinetic equation tρ(t)=italiciLρ(t)+0tdtscriptWfalse(ttfalse)ρ(t).…”
Section: Duality Relation For Open Electronic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open quantum system is most naturally described in terms of its reduced density matrix ρ(t), whose equation of motion is ∂ t ρ(t) = −i[H, ρ(t)] + t 0 dt W(t − t )ρ(t ) [with = k B = e = 1]. The kernel W takes into account the coupling to the external reservoirs [43][44][45][46] that causes ρ(t) to decay. Introducing the Laplace transform of W, W (ω) = ∞ 0 dte iωt W(t), the decay dynamics can be expressed in terms of the frequency(ω)-dependent right eigenvectors of W (ω), the decay modes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kernel W takes into account the coupling to the external reservoirs [43][44][45][46] that causes ρ(t) to decay. Introducing the Laplace transform of…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%