Time lag assessment between research funding and output in emerging technologies

Abstract

PurposeIn this paper, an analysis is presented of the research funding towards nanotechnology at the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) and its relationship to the research output in Nanoscope, an application area of nanotechnology.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyzes the data collected from 1997 till 2006 and derives a definitive time lag between the allocation of research funds and issued patents and published journals. This assessment is achieved by identifying growth trends in patents, funds and publications and doing a curve‐fit analysis using the Fisher‐Pry model. Linear regression analysis is used to show the correlation between the funding and research outputs. Alongside, non‐linear programming objective function optimization technique is used to derive the time lag in years for each of the research outputs from the year of funds granted.FindingsThis paper demonstrated that there is a strong correlation between research funding and different research outputs. The time lag between funding and patents issued is evident from the patent trend analysis and Bibliometric analysis. In the case of Nanoscope, the patent time lag was found to be approximately five to six years, for journal article it was approximately two to three years and conference presentations happened right after the funding. The research outputs showed similar trends and were found to be interdependent as evident from our mathematical analysis.Research limitations/implicationsWhile this study has shown that lag times exist within the chosen example of Nanoscope, and furthermore can be calculated to a precise degree, further data points in terms of additional emerging technologies would support the hypothesis in a more general term. A future study can look at developing technology roadmaps of the future based on the funding happening today.Originality/valueThe work takes bibliometric analysis to a further intelligence and establishes key linkages between these indicators.

Follow the (Industry) Money – The Impact of Science Networks and Industry-to-University Contracts on Academic Patenting in Nanotechnology and Biotechnology

“…Having identified the scientists that have performed contracted work with an organisation prior to being a named inventors on a patent assigned to that particular organisation, we constructed what we referred to earlier as 'innovation loops'. The identification of these loop is an extensive process that also takes into account previous work by Calero et al (2006) to reduce homonymy and synonymy of actors' names and Daim et al (2007) for time-framing.…”

Estimating the payoffs from cardiovascular disease research in Canada: an economic analysis

“…5 To determine an appropriate time lag factor, we reviewed the literature to assess previous approaches. 5,54,55 We drew on 11 papers that were included in a study by Contopoulos-Ioannidis and colleagues 55 and determined a mean time lag of 12.8 (standard deviation 4.0) years. We also considered the case in which time lag followed a normal distribution.…”

Development of a New Methodology to Identity Promising Technology Areas Using M&A Information

“…Inconsistency occurs when experts or panels apply different decision criteria to similar situations. In the case of bibliometric methods based on papers or patents, there is a time lag [10,11] for practical use in the market because it generally takes time to finally publish a paper or apply for a patent from finishing documents to publishing or application. Bibliometric methods also have some drawbacks, including quality, discipline variation, database variation, and bias and discrepancies [12][13][14].…”