2001
DOI: 10.1075/upal.35.06zwa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time in narrative comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from behavioral studies suggest that people are slower and less accurate when reading sentences that start with "before" compared to "after" (Mandler, 1986). Such results have been explained as reflecting people's default expectation that narrated events occur in chronological order, called the iconicity assumption (Zwaan, Madden, & Stanfield, 2001), which is flaunted by sentence-initial "before." Moreover, a classic study by Münte, Schiltz, and Kutas (1998) suggested that "before" incurs immediate and long-lasting processing costs compared to "after."…”
Section: The Activation Of Event Knowledge During Language Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Results from behavioral studies suggest that people are slower and less accurate when reading sentences that start with "before" compared to "after" (Mandler, 1986). Such results have been explained as reflecting people's default expectation that narrated events occur in chronological order, called the iconicity assumption (Zwaan, Madden, & Stanfield, 2001), which is flaunted by sentence-initial "before." Moreover, a classic study by Münte, Schiltz, and Kutas (1998) suggested that "before" incurs immediate and long-lasting processing costs compared to "after."…”
Section: The Activation Of Event Knowledge During Language Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the data by Sell and Kaschak together with the data of this replication advocate the idea that the backfront timeline is automatically involved in comprehending short stories when temporal information about large time shifts need to be monitored across sentences. For example, comprehenders may need to build up a mental situation model that matches the temporal order of reported events during the processing of discourse information (Zwaan, Madden, & Stanfield, 2001). By contrast, comprehenders may manage temporal order information without the involvement of the mental timeline when temporal complexity does not get the upper hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, the order in which events are reported in discourse normally follows their chronological order. However, the default temporal order can be overridden with temporal adverbials, which can be observed in narratives (Ter Meulen, 1995;Zwaan, Madden & Stanfield, 2001). There are also some more idiosyncratic ways of structuring temporal relations in language.…”
Section: Time In Linguistic Construalmentioning
confidence: 99%