1966
DOI: 10.2307/2504249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time in Ancient Historiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Barr used the same historical and comparative linguistic and philological methodologies employed by his predecessors to argue against what he considered to be antiquated and inaccurate conclusions about the Bible's awareness and use of temporality and to challenge the scholarly methodologies in theology that led to such conclusions in the first place. A few years later, Arnaldo Momigliano (1966) extended Barr's conclusions to the field of ancient historiography, arguing that biblical texts as well as pre-classical Greek sources not only operated with conceptions of time in general but also with notions of historical time in particular (on which see also Bickerman 1968 and the earlier work of Zuckermann 1882;1974;Frank 1956). It is clear even to 'the untutored eye of the non-theological reader' (1966: 1), Momigliano insisted, that Genesis 1 begins with a story about the world's creation that is chronological and thus built upon a particular conception of past, present and future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Barr used the same historical and comparative linguistic and philological methodologies employed by his predecessors to argue against what he considered to be antiquated and inaccurate conclusions about the Bible's awareness and use of temporality and to challenge the scholarly methodologies in theology that led to such conclusions in the first place. A few years later, Arnaldo Momigliano (1966) extended Barr's conclusions to the field of ancient historiography, arguing that biblical texts as well as pre-classical Greek sources not only operated with conceptions of time in general but also with notions of historical time in particular (on which see also Bickerman 1968 and the earlier work of Zuckermann 1882;1974;Frank 1956). It is clear even to 'the untutored eye of the non-theological reader' (1966: 1), Momigliano insisted, that Genesis 1 begins with a story about the world's creation that is chronological and thus built upon a particular conception of past, present and future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The comparative study of revolutions lato sensu could be traced back to Thucydides, given that the Athenian historian suggested that the uprisings or civil wars in the cities (στάσεις) were bound to take place again in the future and it would therefore make sense to compare them (Momigliano, 1966: 11–12). In the modern world, there have been comparisons between, first, ancient and modern revolutions (as did the abbé de Vertot and the viscount de Chateaubriand, among others, at the beginning and at the end of the 18th century, respectively) and later between various modern revolutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "eternidade", isto posto, é a verdadeira contrapartida do "tempo". Arnaldo Momigliano e Reinhart Koselleck concordam com esta ideia (Momigliano, 1966;Koselleck, 2000). Segundo Hubert Cancik, a análise que Friedrich Nietzsche faz da antiguidade clássica junto aos estudos de Karl Löwith, Gershom Scholem e Jacob Taubes são os grandes responsáveis por este mal entendido (Cf.…”
Section: Ser E Eternidade Na Tradição Judaico-cristãunclassified