1965
DOI: 10.1037/h0022192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time estimation and increases in body temperature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And the brain, not the oral cavity, is the critical structure in assaying the relation between temperature and velocity of eNS-mediated events. We note that most of the negative reports of altered electrophysiological activity and RTs in human subjects under diurnal or hyperthermic treatments are based on oral or rectal readings oftemperature (see Bajada et al, 1980;Benor & Shvartz, 1971) and/or on localized application of thermal energy to the lower limbs or head (see Bell, 1965;Hancock & Dirkin, 1982), which would permit the greater mass of the body to function as a thermal sink via the circulatory system. Instructive in this regard are the findings of Hayward and Baker (1969), which strongly confirm that the brain of the mammal is a thermally privileged organ; that is, that elaborate, speciesspecific mechanisms have evolved by which cooling of the brain can take place within the cranial vault through respiratory exchange of thermal energy with the cerebral circulatory system.…”
Section: Tympanic and Oral Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…And the brain, not the oral cavity, is the critical structure in assaying the relation between temperature and velocity of eNS-mediated events. We note that most of the negative reports of altered electrophysiological activity and RTs in human subjects under diurnal or hyperthermic treatments are based on oral or rectal readings oftemperature (see Bajada et al, 1980;Benor & Shvartz, 1971) and/or on localized application of thermal energy to the lower limbs or head (see Bell, 1965;Hancock & Dirkin, 1982), which would permit the greater mass of the body to function as a thermal sink via the circulatory system. Instructive in this regard are the findings of Hayward and Baker (1969), which strongly confirm that the brain of the mammal is a thermally privileged organ; that is, that elaborate, speciesspecific mechanisms have evolved by which cooling of the brain can take place within the cranial vault through respiratory exchange of thermal energy with the cerebral circulatory system.…”
Section: Tympanic and Oral Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…111-112). Bell ( 1965Bell ( , 1966Bell ( , 1975 was a consistent critic of the chemical clock idea, even though (as Wearden & Penton-Voak, 1995 , show) his data often off ered full or partial support for the idea of a temperature-sensitive internal timer of some sort (see also Green & Simpson, 1977 ). His objections to Hoagland's idea were twofold.…”
Section: Chemical Clocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study conducted by Droit‐Volet and Provasi () took an initial look at this question but the authors used only a synchronisation task in an exclusively adult population. Nevertheless, two older studies examined the effect of an increase in body temperature on motor tapping (Bell, ; François, ). In each study, the participants were required to tap a Morse key at a rate of three taps per second.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%