2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-40883-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychology of Time Perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 243 publications
(412 reference statements)
1
73
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained by Jazayeri andShadlen (2010, p. 1020), "the brain takes into account knowledge of temporal uncertainty and adapts its time keeping mechanisms to temporal statistics in the environment". Indeed, given that the standard deviation of temporal judgment increases with the length of durations to be estimated, as indicated by the scalar property of timing (for a review see Wearden, 2016), it has been found that the central tendency effect is stronger for longer stimulus durations (Cicchini, Arrighi, Cecchetti, Giusti, & Burr, 2012;Jazayeri & Shadlen, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained by Jazayeri andShadlen (2010, p. 1020), "the brain takes into account knowledge of temporal uncertainty and adapts its time keeping mechanisms to temporal statistics in the environment". Indeed, given that the standard deviation of temporal judgment increases with the length of durations to be estimated, as indicated by the scalar property of timing (for a review see Wearden, 2016), it has been found that the central tendency effect is stronger for longer stimulus durations (Cicchini, Arrighi, Cecchetti, Giusti, & Burr, 2012;Jazayeri & Shadlen, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for further cross-cultural exploration it could be useful to check employees’ understanding of rating scale as it is time anchored. As it is known, different cultures have different perception of a time (e.g., Graham, 1981; Wearden, 2016). It is possible that employees from different cultures differently perceive the same frequency of negative acts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we will elaborate on whether and how time-based task expectancies may influence task-choice behavior. In general, timing studies have primarily focused on investigating the expectancy of certain time durations (general time expectancy; Los & Heslenfeld, 2005;Niemi & Näätänen, 1981), conscious time estimation (interval timing; Balcı & Simen, 2016), and the neural underpinnings of time perception (see, e.g., Merchant & Lafuente, 2014;Wearden, 2016). One basic finding is that subjects can learn to incorporate the expected duration of a foreperiod in their behavior: If the foreperiod duration is predictable or precued, performance (e.g., reaction time, RT) is improved in predicted compared to unpredicted or unpredictable intervals (Coull & Nobre, 1998;Coull, Frith, Büchel, & Nobre, 2000;Los, 2013;Miniussi, Wilding, Coull, & Nobre, 1999).…”
Section: General and Specific Temporal Predictability Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%