1977
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(77)90008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dose factor (TDF) analysis of dose rate effects in permanent implant dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumors in paraaortic sites had significantly better local control than those in the pelvis (P ϭ 0.03). The 5-year overall survival rate was 4% (median ϭ 20 months; 95% CI, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Patients with microscopic residual disease (P ϭ 0.02) and those treated with postoperative external beam irradiation (EBRT) (P ϭ 0.0007) had statistically significant longer survival.…”
Section: Brachytherapy (29 Patients)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumors in paraaortic sites had significantly better local control than those in the pelvis (P ϭ 0.03). The 5-year overall survival rate was 4% (median ϭ 20 months; 95% CI, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Patients with microscopic residual disease (P ϭ 0.02) and those treated with postoperative external beam irradiation (EBRT) (P ϭ 0.0007) had statistically significant longer survival.…”
Section: Brachytherapy (29 Patients)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a permanent seed implant, the total dose D in cGy and TDF are related by Eq. 1, where is the decay constant of the isotope (10,11).…”
Section: Prescription Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modification of the time, dose, and fractionation tables has been made to allow interconvertability between beam radiation and low-dose-rate brachytherapy [36]. There are also substantial practical advantages of brachytherapy, including vastly shorter treatment times and lower costs.…”
Section: Introduction To Permanent Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%