1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01528592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependence of strength of bodies in cleavage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HEL's and the depth of the "pullback" signals, reflecting the spall strengths of the four materials, each illustrate substantial differences between the dynamic response of the wrought and AM-Ta samples as well as a pronounced influence of loading direction relative to the AM build direction. Quantitatively, the spall strengths, calculated from the perspective of the simple spall model [13], and the HEL's of the wrought and three AM-Ta samples are presented in Table I. From the loading portions of the profiles it is readily observed that: 1) all three AM-Ta samples exhibit higher HEL's than the wrought Ta, 2) the thru-thickness direction displays a higher HEL than the in-plane direction for the fully-dense AM-Ta, and 3) for the in-plane direction of the build, the fully dense region HEL is slightly higher than the in-plane direction possessing build flaws.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HEL's and the depth of the "pullback" signals, reflecting the spall strengths of the four materials, each illustrate substantial differences between the dynamic response of the wrought and AM-Ta samples as well as a pronounced influence of loading direction relative to the AM build direction. Quantitatively, the spall strengths, calculated from the perspective of the simple spall model [13], and the HEL's of the wrought and three AM-Ta samples are presented in Table I. From the loading portions of the profiles it is readily observed that: 1) all three AM-Ta samples exhibit higher HEL's than the wrought Ta, 2) the thru-thickness direction displays a higher HEL than the in-plane direction for the fully-dense AM-Ta, and 3) for the in-plane direction of the build, the fully dense region HEL is slightly higher than the in-plane direction possessing build flaws.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HEL's and the depth of the "pull-back" signals, reflecting the spall strengths of the four materials, each illustrate substantial differences between the dynamic response of the wrought and AM-Ta samples as well as a pronounced influence of loading direction relative to the AM build direction. Quantitatively, the spall strengths, calculated from the perspective of the simple spall model [16], and the HEL's of the wrought and three AM-Ta samples are presented in Table II. From the loading portions of the profiles it is readily observed that all three AM-Ta samples exhibit higher HEL's than the wrought Ta.…”
Section: Constitutive Responsementioning
confidence: 99%