2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-006-0125-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Dependence in Mixture Toxicity with Soft Electrophiles: 1. Combined Effects of Selected SN2- and SNAr-Reactive Agents with a Nonpolar Narcotic

Abstract: Frequently the toxicity of an organic chemical mixture is close to dose-additive, even when the agents are thought to induce toxicity at different molecular sites of action. These findings appear to conflict with the hypothesis that a strictly dose-additive combined effect will be observed for agents sharing a single molecular site of toxic action within the organism. In this study, several SN2-reactive (alpha-halogen) or S(N)Ar-reactive (halogenated dinitrobenzene) soft electrophiles were tested with a model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier works have demonstrated the utility of incorporating time-dependent toxicity evaluations (e.g., Gagan et al 2007) and an asymmetry parameter in concentration-response curve-fitting (Dawson et al 2012) when evaluating mixture toxicity. Two recent studies examining toxicity of xAN-containing (Dawson et al 2010) and ExAC-containing binary mixtures (Dawson et al 2011) included: 1) both sham (i.e., A:A) and true combinations (i.e., A:B) for each chemical group and 2) combinations of each of those chemicals with a model nonpolar narcotic, 3-methyl-2-butanone (3M2B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier works have demonstrated the utility of incorporating time-dependent toxicity evaluations (e.g., Gagan et al 2007) and an asymmetry parameter in concentration-response curve-fitting (Dawson et al 2012) when evaluating mixture toxicity. Two recent studies examining toxicity of xAN-containing (Dawson et al 2010) and ExAC-containing binary mixtures (Dawson et al 2011) included: 1) both sham (i.e., A:A) and true combinations (i.e., A:B) for each chemical group and 2) combinations of each of those chemicals with a model nonpolar narcotic, 3-methyl-2-butanone (3M2B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify changes in toxicity over exposure time, TDT values were calculated at the 25, 50 and 75% effect-levels (Gagan et al 2007) and for the 15 to 30-min, 30 to 45-min and 15 to 45-min time-intervals using the appropriate time-factors for each. Time-factors (0.5 for 15 to 30-min, 0.333 for 30 to 45-min and 0.667 for 15 to 45-min) were calculated via the following equation: (t2t1)/t2 with t 2 being the later time of the exposure interval and t 1 the earlier time of that interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have examined toxicity of selected mixtures of industrial organic chemicals (e.g., Gagan et al 2007, Dawson et al 2008), developed and evaluated the 5PL-1P function for concentration-response curve-fitting (Dawson et al 2012, 2016) and examined the viability of using time-dependent toxicity (TDT) of the individual chemicals for predicting TDT of the mixtures (Dawson et al 2014a). The design of these studies has included multiple tests of individual chemicals (Dawson et al 2010, 2011, 2014b, 2016) thereby allowing for assessment of test-to-test consistency of those data, but none of these studies had evaluated such consistency over several tests of the same mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations