2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0479-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-delayed influence of urban landscape change on the susceptibility of koalas to chlamydiosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new habitat may also result in contact with new species, who may act as either vectors for infectious disease or reservoirs for hitherto novel infectious diseases (Wobeser 2006). Even if dispersal is initially successful, the ultimate harm of dispersing to another habitat might not manifest until sometime later (McAlpine et al 2017).…”
Section: Evaluating the Harm That Land Clearing Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new habitat may also result in contact with new species, who may act as either vectors for infectious disease or reservoirs for hitherto novel infectious diseases (Wobeser 2006). Even if dispersal is initially successful, the ultimate harm of dispersing to another habitat might not manifest until sometime later (McAlpine et al 2017).…”
Section: Evaluating the Harm That Land Clearing Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, the koala population of the Liverpool Plains, north‐western New South Wales (NSW), Australia, was identified as one of the only koala populations in NSW to be increasing in occupancy (Lunney et al ., ). More recent surveys identified a declining koala population within this region (Predavec et al ., ) under the cumulative threats from climate change, habitat loss and fragmentation and chlamydiosis (Lunney et al ., ; McAlpine et al ., , ). Multiscale studies of koala presence in other regions have found that there is no single spatial scale at which landscape metrics have the strongest effect on koala presence (McAlpine et al ., 2006a,b, ; Januchowski et al ., ; Smith et al ., 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In koalas, it is plausible that other factors leading to population decline, such as habitat loss and human encroachment on habitat, may precipitate reduced tolerance of infection (Melzer, Carrick, Menkhorst, Lunney, & St. John, 2000); increased clinical disease may therefore be correlated with population decline but not its cause. Recent analysis concluded that urbanization was linked with an increase in clinical disease in koala populations, but noted effects may be delayed until overt disease impacts the population (McAlpine et al, 2017). A noninvasive method of measuring physiological stress in koalas using fecal cortisol metabolites has been developed (Narayan, Webster, Nicolson, Mucci, & Hero, 2013) although its value has been questioned (Johnston et al, 2013).…”
Section: Do These Diseases Drive Population Dynamics?mentioning
confidence: 99%