2004
DOI: 10.1177/1046496403259757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time, Change, and Development

Abstract: Time and change are fundamental aspects of human existence, and like many fundamentals, they pose daunting challenges for research. This is certainly true in the study of small groups. Group research is a resource intensive process, and longitudinal designs 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
8
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scholars may not agree on the specific stages of team or group development, there is a general understanding that groups change during their evolving processes and accumulating experiences over time (Arrow, Poole, Henry, Wheelan, & Moreland, 2004). The results are in line with the current understanding that teams do not progress linearly and systematically, as posited by earlier theories, but the change might be discontinuous (Arrow et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Although scholars may not agree on the specific stages of team or group development, there is a general understanding that groups change during their evolving processes and accumulating experiences over time (Arrow, Poole, Henry, Wheelan, & Moreland, 2004). The results are in line with the current understanding that teams do not progress linearly and systematically, as posited by earlier theories, but the change might be discontinuous (Arrow et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Our inclusion of an objective indicator of participation (i.e., time in the role) as an outcome variable in our model is consistent with how it has been treated in other empirical research designs-as a methodological proxy for other phenomena of theoretical import(McGrath & Kelly, 1986;Mosakowski & Earley, 2000). Hours in a role has, for example, been used as proxy of an individual's goals and their level of commitment to a particular role and underlies notions of productivity and efficiency(Arrow, Poole, Henry, Wheelan, & Morelands, 2004). The inclusion of an objective indicator of union participation in our model, also responds a growing chorus of scholars advocating a "more sophisticated attention to time in theory development and empirical research"(Arrow et al, 2004, p. 78).The following hypotheses guide our exploration of the relationship between active-passive participation and time in union activities in this study:H3.…”
supporting
confidence: 73%
“…In moving forward, and related to this issue, we see a strong need for 'temporal theorybuilding and empirical research' (Roe, Gockel, & Meyer, 2012, p. 630) in the MTS literature. In spite of repeated calls in the organizational behaviour literature (Ancona, Goodman, Lawrence, & Tushman, 2001;Arrow, Poole, Henry, Wheelan, & Moreland, 2004), we still miss process-oriented, temporal theories in MTS research that would allow for a description of how and why, for example, identification, conflict, and performance co-evolve over time. We believe that contact hypothesis holds great potential for temporal theorizing on MTSs and, thus, encourage future research to go in this direction.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%