2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51700-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time and rate dependent synaptic learning in neuro-mimicking resistive memories

Abstract: Memristors have demonstrated immense potential as building blocks in future adaptive neuromorphic architectures. Recently, there has been focus on emulating specific synaptic functions of the mammalian nervous system by either tailoring the functional oxides or engineering the external programming hardware. However, high device-to-device variability in memristors induced by the electroforming process and complicated programming hardware are among the key challenges that hinder achieving biomimetic neuromorphic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The postsynaptic signal is therefore dependent on the action potential amplitude and frequency, called the spike‐rate and ‐amplitude dependent plasticity. [ 8–10 ] High frequencies or large stimulus amplitudes can lead to a persistent durable structural and functional change of the synapse, so that even after a long time, a similar action potential results in a higher postsynaptic potential than for the first stimulus. [ 11,12 ] Memristors have found to be able to emulate those synaptic functions and pave the way for neuromorphic computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postsynaptic signal is therefore dependent on the action potential amplitude and frequency, called the spike‐rate and ‐amplitude dependent plasticity. [ 8–10 ] High frequencies or large stimulus amplitudes can lead to a persistent durable structural and functional change of the synapse, so that even after a long time, a similar action potential results in a higher postsynaptic potential than for the first stimulus. [ 11,12 ] Memristors have found to be able to emulate those synaptic functions and pave the way for neuromorphic computing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to acquire all the four states of nociceptor (threshold, relaxation, allodynia, and hyperalgesia), multiple CMOS circuit units are required. [ 21 ] Memristors, which mimic characteristics of human nervous system, [ 22 ] can essentially resolve the bottleneck due to their exceptional switching performance in sub‐nanometer scale. [ 15,23 ] Therefore, it is of great scientific and technological importance to develop a somatosensory, which responds against real‐life stimuli in the form of pressure, temperature, and pain, exploiting memristor as the fundamental unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of triplet-STDP in neuroscience: the first-spike-dominating model and last-spike-dominating model proposed by Froemke et al and Wang et al, respectively 41,42 . Progress has been made in emulating these two types of triplet-STDP using first-order and second-order memristors 36,[43][44][45] . However, the generalization from triplet-STDP to the BCM learning rule has not yet been experimentally demonstrated in memristors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%