2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time and pressure dependence of acoustic signals radiated from microbubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this relatively small change in static pressure is not expected to have a substantial effect on the BB thresholds (Bader et al, 2012), Dave et al (2013) found subharmonic emissions decreased linearly with increasing ambient pressure. Ganor et al (2005) concluded that this change in subharmonic emission was due in part to the reduction in steady-state bubble radius as a result of a higher compression force. UH emissions have also been found to decrease with increasing static pressure (Sun et al, 2012) although the strength of the dependence varies with insonifying frequency.…”
Section: E Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this relatively small change in static pressure is not expected to have a substantial effect on the BB thresholds (Bader et al, 2012), Dave et al (2013) found subharmonic emissions decreased linearly with increasing ambient pressure. Ganor et al (2005) concluded that this change in subharmonic emission was due in part to the reduction in steady-state bubble radius as a result of a higher compression force. UH emissions have also been found to decrease with increasing static pressure (Sun et al, 2012) although the strength of the dependence varies with insonifying frequency.…”
Section: E Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the experimental setup was plagued by acquisition problems (employing 2 single element transducers held together with duct tape and no imaging capabilities [13]), which is clearly not clinically acceptable. Other studies have explored SHAPE in vitro [14][15][16][17][18], but without flow dynamics i.e., under static conditions. The objective of this work was to evaluate the use of microbubbles to track dynamic pressures in a continuous flow environment and to develop a SHAPE application using a commercially available ultrasound scanner and an existing ultrasound contrast agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to correctly estimate the micro bubble concentration in perfused tissues, the non linear behaviour of micro bubbles regarding the insonating pressure has to be characterized and modelled. The deviation of the bubble response from the one of a linear scatterer is complex and subject to many parameters [1][2] [3], and has been explored in many different approaches and ranges [1] [4] [5] [6] [7][8] [9]. However an accurate method of measuring the bubble concentration has not been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%