1994
DOI: 10.2307/2261301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tiller Dynamics of Two Grasses--Responses to Grazing, Density and Weather

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that tiller density in grass swards exhibits considerable response to the environment and management [10,18,21,22,[29][30][31]. It is therefore important to develop a model which can predict tiller density dynamics under varying environmental and management conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that tiller density in grass swards exhibits considerable response to the environment and management [10,18,21,22,[29][30][31]. It is therefore important to develop a model which can predict tiller density dynamics under varying environmental and management conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most perennial grasses have bimodal recruitment patterns with flushes of new tillers emerging during the spring and fall (Langer 1956, Briske and Butler 1989, Briske and Richards 1995 ) , o n l y produced 1 annual cohort. These established patterns of tiller recruitment may be affected by defoliation which extends the recruitment period (Butler and Briske 1988), promotes additional tiller cohorts (Olson and Richards 1988a), and changes the timing of peak recruitment (Bullock et al 1994). Tiller recruitment is also a major method of perennial grass persistence (Hendrickson and Briske 1997) and annual tiller replacement is necessary to maintain tiller density (Olson and Richards 1988b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shoot natality and mortality have been explained in terms of densitydependent competition (Kays and Harper 1974;Mook and van der Toorn 1982;Lonsdale and Watkinson 1983;Bullock et al 1994) and physiological integration that moderates shoot competition (Hutchings and Barkham 1976;Hutchings 1979;Liddle et al 1982;Pitelka 1984;Hutchings and Bradbury 1986;Hara et al 1993;Suzuki 1994). However, these studies do not show how clonal shoot dynamics maintain the shoot population of the next generation, that is, they do not show how it contributes to the "persistence" of clones (genets) (sensu Eriksson and Jerling 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%