2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight end-to-end per-flow delay bounds in FIFO multiplexing sink-tree networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have published a preliminary analytical framework for single-switch networks [16]. The current paper extends that work with theoretical proofs and analysis for networks with multiple switches.…”
Section: ________mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have published a preliminary analytical framework for single-switch networks [16]. The current paper extends that work with theoretical proofs and analysis for networks with multiple switches.…”
Section: ________mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The two approaches are based on the same network architecture (switched Ethernet) and queuing mechanism (FCFS), but use different traffic models and analytical schemes to calculate the worst-case end-to-end delays [16]. We will first describe the delay estimation used in NC-LH, and then introduce a theory for transforming the strictly periodic traffic model used in our analysis into the rate-andburstiness-constrained model used in NC-LH.…”
Section: Relation To Network Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that bound are tight for a single server [1, Th 1.4.4]. There also are results for FIFO policy in some specific topologies [31]. [28,29] describe the first algorithm which computes the maximum end-toend delay for a given flow, as well as the maximum backlog at a server, for any feed-forward network topology under blind multiplexing, with concave arrival curves and convex service curves.…”
Section: Tight Results Under Blind Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End-to-end delay bounds for aggregate FIFO scheduling were derived in networks with general topologies [6], [15], [29], and networks with restricted topologies (e.g. acyclic or sinktree) [12], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%