2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2017.08.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight binding calculation of tunneling conductance of a metal/ferromagnetic junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the mean time, the G is also suppressed by decreasing the ratio of m R /m FM . Similar behavior of G curve has also been found in previous works of M/FM junction [45,46]. According to the conductance spectrum of the metal/2DEG with a RSOC junction, the Rashba energy can be predicted directly from the characteristic features of the G vs. eV curves [35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the mean time, the G is also suppressed by decreasing the ratio of m R /m FM . Similar behavior of G curve has also been found in previous works of M/FM junction [45,46]. According to the conductance spectrum of the metal/2DEG with a RSOC junction, the Rashba energy can be predicted directly from the characteristic features of the G vs. eV curves [35][36][37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Normally, a thin thickness of insulator acts as a Dirac delta potential between two materials, and a high barrier can block the particle crossing the junction as well [47]. Interestingly, the kink of G is displayed at the eV = E C in the ARM state, unlike in charge conductance of conventional Rashba system junction [35,45]. The kink shows in the ARM state because an evanescent wave occurs; (k ↑ x ) 2 < 0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation