2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018wr022793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tidal Response of Groundwater in a Leaky Aquifer—Application to Oklahoma

Abstract: Quantitative interpretation of the tidal response of water levels measured in wells has long been made either with a model for perfectly confined aquifers or with a model for purely unconfined aquifers. However, many aquifers may be neither totally confined nor purely unconfined at the frequencies of tidal loading but behave somewhere between the two end‐members. Here we present a more general model for the tidal response of groundwater in aquifers with both horizontal flow and vertical leakage. The model has … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
255
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(130 reference statements)
8
255
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further support our conclusion, we employed the tidal leaky aquifer model proposed by Wang et al () to infer quantitative changes in the vertical permeability of the aquitard. The tidal response in a leaky aquifer model can be expressed as follows: η=arg[]italiciωSiωS+K'b'ξ where ξ=1+rcrw2italiciωrw2italicTβK0()βrwK1()βrw β=K'Tb'+italiciωST0.5 and η is defined as the phase shift, ω is the angular frequency of the M 2 wave; S and T are the aquifer storativity and transmissivity; r c is the radius of the well casing; r w is the radius of the well screen; K 0 and K 1 are the modified Bessel functions of the second kind and the zero order and first order, respectively; and K ′ and b ′ are the vertical hydraulic conductivity and thickness of the aquitard, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To further support our conclusion, we employed the tidal leaky aquifer model proposed by Wang et al () to infer quantitative changes in the vertical permeability of the aquitard. The tidal response in a leaky aquifer model can be expressed as follows: η=arg[]italiciωSiωS+K'b'ξ where ξ=1+rcrw2italiciωrw2italicTβK0()βrwK1()βrw β=K'Tb'+italiciωST0.5 and η is defined as the phase shift, ω is the angular frequency of the M 2 wave; S and T are the aquifer storativity and transmissivity; r c is the radius of the well casing; r w is the radius of the well screen; K 0 and K 1 are the modified Bessel functions of the second kind and the zero order and first order, respectively; and K ′ and b ′ are the vertical hydraulic conductivity and thickness of the aquitard, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Neither of these two models can be used alone in our case, because the phase shift changed from negative to positive after the earthquake. Meanwhile, according to previous studies, the phase shift increase is due to an enhancement of aquifer permeability and is associated with an increase in the amplitude ratio in a confined aquifer (Elkhoury et al, ; Hsieh et al, ; Lai et al, ; Roeloffs, ; Rojstaczer & Riley, ) or is associated with a decrease in the amplitude ratio and is due to an increased vertical permeability in the aquitard (Shi & Wang, ; Wang et al, ). Thus, if permeability increases in both aquifer and aquitard, the phase shift will show a large increase, but the amplitude ratios will show either an increase or decrease with reduced magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tidal response to strain can also be used to estimate reservoir properties under various assumptions (e.g., Bredehoeft, ; Hsieh et al, ; Wang et al, ). The specific storage S S can be expressed (van der Kamp & Gale, ) as SS=12normalν1ν1hϵ, where h ϵ is the areal strain response factor (in meters per strain) obtained from tidal analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roeloffs () proposed using the water level response to the Earth tide to estimate the vertical hydraulic diffusivity of the aquifer as follows: p(),zω=BKu()1e()1+iz/2D/ωε0 where p ( z , ω ) is the pore pressure fluctuation at a burial depth of z ; B is Skempton's constant; K u is Young's modulus of rock in a nondrained state; ɛ 0 is the initial volumetric strain; and D is the hydraulic diffusivity. Wang et al () presented the phase shift of the well water level response to the Earth tide in aquifers with both horizontal and vertical flow as follows: lefttrueη=argiωS()italiciωS+K'/b'ζζ=1+()rcrw2rw2K0βrwK1βrwβ=K'Tb'+italiciωST where b ' and K ' are the thickness and hydraulic conductivity of the aquitard, respectively, and K 0 and K 1 are zero‐order and first‐order Kelvin functions, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%