2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1471-4922(00)01856-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
210
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
210
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of present PCR results, it could be mentioned that highest number (45.94 %) of positive cases having mixed infection of B. canis and B. gibsoni. This is important for the purpose of obtaining maximum response to therapy in clinical cases as observed by Shaw et al (2001) and Walter et al (2002) who reported drug regimen against the two species were different and treatment against one species might be unsuccessful due to usual presence of mixed infection. Molecular analysis in the present study provided powerful information over blood smears examination, which did not provide definite diagnostic information on B. canis compared to that of B. gibsoni.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of present PCR results, it could be mentioned that highest number (45.94 %) of positive cases having mixed infection of B. canis and B. gibsoni. This is important for the purpose of obtaining maximum response to therapy in clinical cases as observed by Shaw et al (2001) and Walter et al (2002) who reported drug regimen against the two species were different and treatment against one species might be unsuccessful due to usual presence of mixed infection. Molecular analysis in the present study provided powerful information over blood smears examination, which did not provide definite diagnostic information on B. canis compared to that of B. gibsoni.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate of 8.6% of PCR-positive cats in two target genes highlights the potential infection by E. canis in the feline population of Cuiabá, which is a known E. canis epidemic region in Brazil (SILVA et al, 2010;ALMEIDA et al, 2012;MELO et al, 2011). Clinical and laboratory manifestations suggestive of ehrlichiosis have been reported in cats (BREITSCHWERDT et al, 2002) and, unlike CME, little is known about the pathogenesis or immunopathological implications resulting from chronic infection in cats (SHAW et al, 2001). The PCR results revealed that positive cats have a tendency for lymphopenia (p= 0.07), a finding that is commonly reported in animals in the acute phase of infection (HARRUS et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms suggestive of ehrlichiosis infection have also been reported in domestic cats in several countries. The Ehrlichia species that naturally infect cats have not yet been fully determined, although monocyte and lymphocyte inclusions and, more consistently, E. canis DNA, have been detected in cats (BREITSCHWERDT et al, 2002;OLIVEIRA et al, 2009;BRAGA et al, 2012), as well as some granulocytic inclusions related to feline granulocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum (BUORO et al, 1989;BOULOY et al, 1994;BEAUFILS et al, 1995;BJOERSDORFF et al, 1999;SHAW et al, 2001;AGUIRRE et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have reported on the seasonality of the onset of IMHA (Jackson and Kruth 1985;Klag et al 1993;Duval and Giger 1996;Burgess et al 2000;Weinkle et al 2005;McAlees 2010) with increased exposure to infectious agents in certain seasons being suggested to trigger the disease. The occurrence of IMHA secondary to vector-borne diseases affects dogs that live or have visited the geographic area where the vector is endemic (Morita et al 1995;Frank and Breitschwerdt 1999;Shaw et al 2001). Inconsistencies in disease incidence between countries might be explained by differences in exposure risk in different geographic locations.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%