2012
DOI: 10.1177/0363546512438762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tibial Tubercle–Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distance

Abstract: Only 57% of the patients with a pathological TT-TG distance (≥20 mm) had lateralization of the tibial tubercle in relation to the posterior cruciate ligament. The TT-PCL distance is an alternative method for determining the position of the tibial tubercle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
126
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
126
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, clinical evidences of lateral patella tracking in combination with values of 20 mm and greater have been classified as excessive TT-TG with a recommendation to include an anteromedialization (AMZ) TTO in the treatment of recurrent instability [17,22,23]. Several authors have advocated for the use of TT-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) with a distance > 24 mm as the threshold for distal realignment as TT-PCL relies exclusively on tibial landmarks, eliminating the influence of femoral rotation [24][25][26]. Although TT-TG remains the more widely accepted method, there may be considerable benefit to the use of TT-PCL in the setting of Dejour type B, C, or D trochlear dysplasia due to the inherent challenges in identifying an abnormal or absent trochlear groove.…”
Section: Tibial Tubercle-trochlear Groove Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, clinical evidences of lateral patella tracking in combination with values of 20 mm and greater have been classified as excessive TT-TG with a recommendation to include an anteromedialization (AMZ) TTO in the treatment of recurrent instability [17,22,23]. Several authors have advocated for the use of TT-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) with a distance > 24 mm as the threshold for distal realignment as TT-PCL relies exclusively on tibial landmarks, eliminating the influence of femoral rotation [24][25][26]. Although TT-TG remains the more widely accepted method, there may be considerable benefit to the use of TT-PCL in the setting of Dejour type B, C, or D trochlear dysplasia due to the inherent challenges in identifying an abnormal or absent trochlear groove.…”
Section: Tibial Tubercle-trochlear Groove Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors significantly influence this measurement. The TT-TG distance is sensitive to knee rotation, small changes in femoral alignment and axial CT or MRI scan orientation[ 45 , 46 ]. In addition, low reproducibility of the measurement has been described, with an error of about 3-4 mm depending on the slices selected and the landmarks chosen by the radiologist[ 47 ].…”
Section: Is Radiological Assessment Helpful In Decision Making When Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance has been recently introduced as a measurement not influenced by the rotation of the knee or the shape of the trochlea (Figure 11 )[ 45 ]. Similarly, the new TT-TG index allows for correlation of the distance with individual joint size, which is especially important in cases of marginal TT-TG distance[ 48 ].…”
Section: Is Radiological Assessment Helpful In Decision Making When Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47,48] When assessing PFJI patients with marked trochlear dysplasia, a tibial tuberosity-PCL (TT:PCL) distance can be more useful instead of a TT:TG distance in determining the location of the tibial tuberosity independent of the trochlear shape, given that high TT:TG could result from either tibial tuberosity lateralization or trochlear groove medialization without discrimination. [49]…”
Section: Trochleoplastymentioning
confidence: 99%