Abstract:Multiple cadaveric studies have characterized the anatomy of the MPFL and the related morphologic abnormalities that contribute to recurrent lateral patellar instability. Such abnormalities include patella alta, excessive tibial tubercle to trochlear grove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, and malalignment. Recent studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with the treatment of concomitant pathology in combination with MPFL reconstruction, which is critical in avoiding recurrent instability a… Show more
“…Patella alta can be determined through a variety of methods (e.g., Insall-Salvati ratio (normal 0.8-1.2), Caton-Deschamps index (normal 0.6-1.3), Blackburn-Peel ratio (normal 0.5-1.0)) by evaluating a lateral radiograph of the knee [12]. Correction of patellar height via a tibial tubercle distalization procedure helps confer stability to the patellofemoral articulation via early patellar engagement but is reserved for patients who are skeletally mature [28]. However, care should be taken with distalization procedures to avoid increasing patellofemoral contact pressures and iatrogenic early PFJ arthrosis.…”
Section: Osseous Deformity Correction: Guided Growth or Osteotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate tensioning to allow for a checkrein through a large arc of motion while not overtightening the ligament is important in recreating the normal anatomy. Appropriate tensioning has been demonstrated as 2 N and should be assessed along with graft isometry through the knee range of motion intraoperatively [28]. Over-tensioning can lead to stiffness, early arthritis, and tension-induced fractures at the superior pole or medial rim.…”
Purpose of Review The purpose of the review is to discuss the relevant pathoanatomy, management, complications, and technical considerations for recurrent patellofemoral instability (PFI) in the pediatric population. Special consideration is given to recent literature and management of the patient with repeat instability following surgery. Recent Findings Patellar stabilization surgery is in principle dependent upon restoration of normal patellofemoral anatomy and dynamic alignment. Historically, treatment options have been numerous and include extensor mechanism realignment, trochleoplasty, and more recently repair and/or reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as a dynamic check rein during initial knee flexion. In skeletally immature patients, preference is given to physeal-sparing soft tissue procedures. While medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction has become a popular option, postoperative failure is a persistent issue with rates ranging from 5 to 30% for PFI surgery in general without any single procedure (e.g., distal realignment, MPFL reconstruction) demonstrating clear superiority. Failure of surgical patellar stabilization is broadly believed to occur for three main reasons: (1) technical failure of the primary stabilization method, (2) unaddressed static and dynamic pathoanatomy during the primary stabilization, and (3) intrinsic risk factors (e.g., collagen disorders, ligamentous laxity). Summary PFI is a common orthopedic condition affecting the pediatric and adolescent population. Treatment of repeat instability following surgery in the PFI patient requires understanding and addressing underlying pathoanatomic risk factors as well as risks and reasons for failure.
“…Patella alta can be determined through a variety of methods (e.g., Insall-Salvati ratio (normal 0.8-1.2), Caton-Deschamps index (normal 0.6-1.3), Blackburn-Peel ratio (normal 0.5-1.0)) by evaluating a lateral radiograph of the knee [12]. Correction of patellar height via a tibial tubercle distalization procedure helps confer stability to the patellofemoral articulation via early patellar engagement but is reserved for patients who are skeletally mature [28]. However, care should be taken with distalization procedures to avoid increasing patellofemoral contact pressures and iatrogenic early PFJ arthrosis.…”
Section: Osseous Deformity Correction: Guided Growth or Osteotomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate tensioning to allow for a checkrein through a large arc of motion while not overtightening the ligament is important in recreating the normal anatomy. Appropriate tensioning has been demonstrated as 2 N and should be assessed along with graft isometry through the knee range of motion intraoperatively [28]. Over-tensioning can lead to stiffness, early arthritis, and tension-induced fractures at the superior pole or medial rim.…”
Purpose of Review The purpose of the review is to discuss the relevant pathoanatomy, management, complications, and technical considerations for recurrent patellofemoral instability (PFI) in the pediatric population. Special consideration is given to recent literature and management of the patient with repeat instability following surgery. Recent Findings Patellar stabilization surgery is in principle dependent upon restoration of normal patellofemoral anatomy and dynamic alignment. Historically, treatment options have been numerous and include extensor mechanism realignment, trochleoplasty, and more recently repair and/or reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as a dynamic check rein during initial knee flexion. In skeletally immature patients, preference is given to physeal-sparing soft tissue procedures. While medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction has become a popular option, postoperative failure is a persistent issue with rates ranging from 5 to 30% for PFI surgery in general without any single procedure (e.g., distal realignment, MPFL reconstruction) demonstrating clear superiority. Failure of surgical patellar stabilization is broadly believed to occur for three main reasons: (1) technical failure of the primary stabilization method, (2) unaddressed static and dynamic pathoanatomy during the primary stabilization, and (3) intrinsic risk factors (e.g., collagen disorders, ligamentous laxity). Summary PFI is a common orthopedic condition affecting the pediatric and adolescent population. Treatment of repeat instability following surgery in the PFI patient requires understanding and addressing underlying pathoanatomic risk factors as well as risks and reasons for failure.
“…The MPFL reconstruction was undertaken in the manner previously described by Smith et al 24 to re-create the sail shape of the native MPFL, with its attachment on the † Address correspondence to Thomas E. Moran, MD, 710 Walker Square, Apt #3D, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA (email: tem9rs@virginia.edu). *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.…”
Section: Small (32-mm) Short Oblique Patellar Tunnels For Patellarmentioning
Background: Large (4.5 mm) and/or transpatellar bone tunnels have been associated with patellar fracture after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. To avoid this outcome, many surgeons now employ suture anchors to affix the MPFL graft to the patella. Purpose: To evaluate the risk of patellar fracture and other outcomes associated with smaller (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels as compared with suture anchor fixation in MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A single institution’s electronic medical record was queried for all patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction between March 2010 and December 2018. A chart review of operative reports was utilized to identify those who had undergone MPFL reconstruction. Patients undergoing revision MPFL reconstruction or reconstruction with fully transpatellar bone tunnels were excluded. The incidence of patellar fracture and outcomes were evaluated from chart review. The mean duration of follow-up was >2 years. Results: A total of 384 knees in 352 patients undergoing primary MPFL reconstruction were identified. Small (3.2-mm), short, oblique tunnels were used for patellar fixation in 215 cases, and suture anchors were utilized in 169 cases. The small, oblique tunnels and suture anchor techniques both resulted in a low incidence of patellar fracture, with rates of 0.47% and 0%, respectively. The use of suture anchors was associated with an increased risk of subluxation or dislocation compared with small, oblique tunnels (odds ratio, 3.98; P = .028). No significant difference was found in the need for revision MPFL reconstruction surgery with suture anchors (odds ratio, 1.925; P = .66). Conclusion: The use of small, oblique tunnels with hamstring autograft is a safe means of patellar fixation in MPFL reconstruction. The use of small, oblique tunnels for patellar fixation versus 2 suture anchors can result in material cost savings with no significantly increased risk for fracture as well as an overall reduction in complication rates.
“…A full summary on the evaluation of patellar instability is outside the scope of this Technical Note, but history taking should detail the instability events themselves and help the surgeon to identify the frequency and chronicity of such events. 9 Detailed history, physical exam, and radiographic evaluation are vital to identify the presence of primary anatomic risk factors of patellar instability, including trochlear dysplasia, coronal malalignment manifested as genu valgum or elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, femoral anteversion, and patella alta. 1 We acquire a standard 3-view radiographic series, including a standing flexion posteroanterior, lateral, and 45° flexed axial Merchant view of the knee as part of our initial imaging workup.…”
Multiple techniques exist for patellar graft fixation during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, each with their respective advantages and disadvantages. In recent studies, the use of 2 small (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels with looped graft has been shown to be effective for patellar fixation during MPFL reconstruction. This technique does not appear to be associated with the same risk of patellar fracture as the use of larger (4.5-mm) transpatellar tunnels. A recent retrospective study also reported decreased risk of recurrent patellar instability and decreased cost compared with the use of suture anchors for patellar fixation, which is currently the most common modality. Given these promising findings relative to existing techniques for patellar fixation, further description of the senior author’s technique for using these small (3.2-mm), short, oblique patellar tunnels is provided. This technique is safe, efficacious, and cost-conscious and should be considered a viable option for patellar fixation during MPFL reconstruction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.