2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.03.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ti–Ni ohmic contacts on 3C–SiC doped by nitrogen or phosphorus implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noticed that regardless of the dose levels, all groups experienced a surface degradation, although the high dose sample surfaces were degraded more severely, indicating higher lattice damage [5,18]. The SiO 2 capped samples were left with a higher roughness compared with the uncapped ones in all batches.…”
Section: Surface Roughness Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be noticed that regardless of the dose levels, all groups experienced a surface degradation, although the high dose sample surfaces were degraded more severely, indicating higher lattice damage [5,18]. The SiO 2 capped samples were left with a higher roughness compared with the uncapped ones in all batches.…”
Section: Surface Roughness Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A series of energies with increasing total doses were applied during implantation to form box profile at 3 doping levels, which will be called high dose, medium dose and low dose samples in following text. Nitrogen was selected as the dopant rather than phosphorous since it does less damage to the 3C-SiC film [17,18] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most studied metals for n-type 3C-SiC Ohmic contacts are Al [2][3][4], Ti [3][4][5] and Ni [2,4,6,7], and the resultant ρ c Manuscript submitted July 20, 2016 ) n-type 3C-SiC back in 1995 [3], although with a considerable resistivity spread of over 6x10 -5 Ω.cm -2 . The literature shows that Al contacts generally have the lowest ρ c value, which can be explained by the negligible SBH between Al and 3C-SiC (~0 eV) compared with Ti (0.4 eV) and Ni (0.55 eV) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%