Through a Public Darkly: Reconstructing Pragmatist Perspectives in Communication Theory

Abstract

This article aims to retrieve the problem-responsive dimension of pragmatist theories in their relevance for the reconceptualization of public participation in communication theory. This dimension is central to pragmatist perspectives on the formation and functioning of publics and I propose that we reconstruct pragmatism as a tradition of communication theory in light of this fact. First, I reexamine the historical emergence of pragmatism in communication theory and I suggest James Carey was unable to challenge positivism or objectivism from within a pragmatist tradition. Second, I retrieve John Dewey's account of inquiry in a manner anticipating its implications for his theory of publics. Third, I resituate the Dewey-Lippmann debate within the context of a pragmatist tradition to demonstrate how deeply their differences turn on problem formulation. In conclusion, I connect the pragmatist tradition to contemporary work on problematization to address the limitations of each perspective.

Taming Deep Uncertainty: The Potential of Pragmatist Principles for Understanding and Improving Strategic Crisis Management

“…"Fire" is natural phenomenon, but when firefighters talk about fire it is also a linguistic category. Pragmatism's attention to symbols and language leads it to place great stock in communication, which it understands as the fundamental basis of social coordination (Russill, 2008). But it regards communication as challenging because meaning differs according to experience and situation.…”

The Situations of Urban Inquiry: Thinking Problematically about the City

“…The process of determining problematic situations takes place against the background of what Dewey referred to as ‘extensive and enduring' situations (Dewey, : 340). The distinction between extensive and enduring situations on the one hand and, on the other, problematic situations that become the focus of explicit attention is important because it indicates that problem responsiveness is a feature of everyday life as much as it is a feature of specialized contexts for the framing of responsive activity (see Russill, ). The distinction therefore allows us to escape the trap of thinking that problematizations are interruptions or disruptions of unproblematic routines.…”

Communication Theory at the Center: Ventriloquism and the Communicative Constitution of Reality

“…As Craig (2007) himself has pointed out recently, this call for a dialogue between traditions was, unfortunately, not met with any real enthusiasm by the communication field. Despite an interesting debate around the pragmatic dimension of Craig's metamodel, by Chris Russill in particular (Craig, 2007; Russill, 2005, 2008), one cannot help but notice that no attempt has apparently been made to respond to his invitation, as if it was taken for granted that our field was forever condemned to fragmentation and incoherence.…”