2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thromboembolic events and hemorrhagic stroke after mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) covid-19 vaccination: A self-controlled case series study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For hemorrhagic events 0 to 27 days after vaccination, the adjusted RR was 1.48 (CI, 1.12 to 1.96), with an SCCS RR of 0.95 (CI, 0.82 to 1.11). Finally, a recent study in Hong Kong detected a possible safety signal for hemorrhagic stroke after receipt of the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine ( 11 ); our study did not confirm this signal. To our knowledge, no study to date has assessed the association between the Janssen vaccine and risk for cardiovascular events.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…For hemorrhagic events 0 to 27 days after vaccination, the adjusted RR was 1.48 (CI, 1.12 to 1.96), with an SCCS RR of 0.95 (CI, 0.82 to 1.11). Finally, a recent study in Hong Kong detected a possible safety signal for hemorrhagic stroke after receipt of the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine ( 11 ); our study did not confirm this signal. To our knowledge, no study to date has assessed the association between the Janssen vaccine and risk for cardiovascular events.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…These findings are consistent with the results of previous observational studies including a modified SCCS for BNT162B2 [13] , and cohort studies for BNT162B2 and both mRNA vaccines [5] , [6] . However, a recent modified SCCS using Hong Kong electric health and vaccine records suggested an increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke within 27 days after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in the overall population (IRR; 1st dose: 1.67 [1.04–2.69]; 2nd dose: 1.68 [0.99–2.84]) [14] . A large comparative study would be needed to confirm such a risk; however, our analysis did not show any increased risk of these diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we applied the “modified” SCCS, which can treat such outcome-dependent exposures [11] , [12] . Some previous studies evaluating the risk of COVID-19 vaccination on some serious outcomes also used the modified SCCS [13] , [14] . According to the recommendation in the methodological papers for modified SCCS [11] , [12] , we artificially prolonged the follow-up until the end of the study period (30th September 2021) if the follow-up of the participant ended due to death.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies on evidence of the adverse bleeding and clotting risks following first and second dose of ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccination and boosters including mRNA-1273. Various studies, including ones from Scotland, England and Denmark have reported associations of first vaccination dose with adverse bleeding and clotting events 12 14 , 28 , 29 ; however, none of the studies reported on risk post second dose and booster. Our results show that some risks persist post second and booster doses but there is considerable uncertainty due to the rarity of events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%