1942
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1942.01500090066006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold Erythema Dose of Roentgen Rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1942
1942
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through this apertui'e only a circular area of 0-5 centimetre diameter receives the radiation (MacKee, Mutcheller and Cipollaro, 1943} and only approximately 600 r, or half the dose as measured in air, is received by the core (Goldberg, 1944). Thus the core of the wart receives 2200 r, and although this would appear to be a large single dose, the area is so small that the risk of later damage is negligible as tissue injury effect (Belisario, 1942) and backscatter are practically eliminated and any possible later irradiation sequelee could easily be removed surgically. So far no aubsequeut effeets have been observed.…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this apertui'e only a circular area of 0-5 centimetre diameter receives the radiation (MacKee, Mutcheller and Cipollaro, 1943} and only approximately 600 r, or half the dose as measured in air, is received by the core (Goldberg, 1944). Thus the core of the wart receives 2200 r, and although this would appear to be a large single dose, the area is so small that the risk of later damage is negligible as tissue injury effect (Belisario, 1942) and backscatter are practically eliminated and any possible later irradiation sequelee could easily be removed surgically. So far no aubsequeut effeets have been observed.…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%