2011
DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold Effectiveness in Contributing to the Public Goods: Experiments Involving Czech Students

Abstract: Abstract:Voluntary contribution mechanism to public goods is one of the traditional types of economic experiments. The article summarizes the results of series of experiments that have been conducted with several groups of Czech university students. Using the threshold mechanism the impact of several factors (experience, communication and the form of experiment) on voluntary contribution to public goods is tested. The results confi rm, to a great extent, fi ndings published by foreign studies. The results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nemec (1998) emphasized the economic and social specifics of transitive economics countries relative to individual behavior. The previous Czech results (see Šeneklová & Špalek, 2009;or Špalek & Berná, 2011or Špalek & Berná, , 2012, however, demonstrated no important disparities between the Czech and foreign results related to the voluntary contribution mechanism.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Nemec (1998) emphasized the economic and social specifics of transitive economics countries relative to individual behavior. The previous Czech results (see Šeneklová & Špalek, 2009;or Špalek & Berná, 2011or Špalek & Berná, , 2012, however, demonstrated no important disparities between the Czech and foreign results related to the voluntary contribution mechanism.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Several theoretical models demonstrate that the assurance problem is mitigated by a credible money-back guarantee that applies if the threshold for the provision of the public good is not met (Bagnoli and Lipman, 1989; Palfrey and Rosenthal, 1984; Tabarrok, 1998). Experimental evidence from the laboratory (Cadsby and Maynes, 1999; Isaac et al , 1989; Marks and Croson, 1998; Rondeau et al , 1999; Špalek and Berná, 2011), as well as from the field (Rondeau et al , 2005; Rose et al , 2002), confirms that the introduction of refunds increases total contributions to a public good. In the past, the use of refunds for a large group of contributors was costly.…”
Section: The Assurance Problem Refunds and Rebatesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2 Each of them could win up to 10 extra-credits (10 % of the sum needed to pass the subject). The motivation follows our former experience with (not only teaching) experiments (see Šeneklová, Špalek, 2009;Špalek, Berná, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%