2020
DOI: 10.1111/capa.12391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three understandings of administrative work: discretion, agency, and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet adjudicative agencies (for example, Immigration and Refugee Board, Parole Board of Canada) split from the weaker environment evident in enforcement agencies (for example, Canada Border Services Agency, Correctional Service of Canada) in this analysis. Prior work on adjudicative agencies suggests that there is a policy-making role in the process of creating jurisprudential guides and internal processes, thus generating innovation potential, even as they aim to foster efficiency and consistency in decision making (Houle and Sossin, 2006;Tomkinson, 2018Tomkinson, , 2020). Yet on the key measures of autonomy, those working in enforcement agencies are considerably more likely to report that their work suffers due to changing priorities and a lack of stability in the organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet adjudicative agencies (for example, Immigration and Refugee Board, Parole Board of Canada) split from the weaker environment evident in enforcement agencies (for example, Canada Border Services Agency, Correctional Service of Canada) in this analysis. Prior work on adjudicative agencies suggests that there is a policy-making role in the process of creating jurisprudential guides and internal processes, thus generating innovation potential, even as they aim to foster efficiency and consistency in decision making (Houle and Sossin, 2006;Tomkinson, 2018Tomkinson, , 2020). Yet on the key measures of autonomy, those working in enforcement agencies are considerably more likely to report that their work suffers due to changing priorities and a lack of stability in the organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysing (2021) argues that governments are increasingly using new modes of governance to persuade non-state actors to voluntarily take responsibility for societal problems (such as road safety) because the ability of states to maintain a strong regulatory presence is being questioned due to a lack of democratic legitimacy and effectiveness. Tomkinson (2020) contends that the private sector's inaction in implementing road safety policy measures allows government officials like the NTSA and NPS officers to abuse their discretion by either avoiding making decisions that will help policy implementation or delaying policy implementation, or only partially implementing policy (Gilson, 2015). Congruently, when it came to whether non-state actors like NGOs and the corporate sector pushed matatu operators to adhere to road safety standards, interview responses echoed the view that non-state actors had no influence on matatu operators.…”
Section: Politics Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the integrated approach attempts to combine these two perspectives and proposes that many actors and institutions can play a positive role in enhancing administrative justice. It insists that administrative justice is pursued in diverse contexts, such as frontline assessments (Cowan et al, 2017), complaint handling by Ombudsman (Buck et al, 2007), administrative review and quasi-judicial decision making processes within administrative courts and tribunals (Lens, 2012;Tomkinson, 2018;Tomkinson, 2020). Given the diversity of these settings, researchers and practitioners tend to refer to a system, landscape, framework, or terrain of administrative justice (Sossin, 2017;Doyle and O'Brien, 2020;Abraham, 2012;Thomas, 2011;Tomkinson, 2023).…”
Section: Administrative Justice and Tribunal Judgesmentioning
confidence: 99%