1959
DOI: 10.2307/2088567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Problems in The Analysis of Community Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1961
1961
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Diverse information is also "commensurate with a richer set of opportunities" (McEvily et al, 1999(McEvily et al, :1138. Stakeholders in any political environment vary across a broad range of parameters including their prioritization of issues (Polsby, 1959;Wolfinger, 1960), the cognitive schema that creates a sense of identity (Rowley et al, 2003), and the basis (i.e., informal vs. formal) and magnitude of power. These differences may be driven by variation in ethnicity, demographics, religion, ideology, education and myriad other factors.…”
Section: Network As Pipesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diverse information is also "commensurate with a richer set of opportunities" (McEvily et al, 1999(McEvily et al, :1138. Stakeholders in any political environment vary across a broad range of parameters including their prioritization of issues (Polsby, 1959;Wolfinger, 1960), the cognitive schema that creates a sense of identity (Rowley et al, 2003), and the basis (i.e., informal vs. formal) and magnitude of power. These differences may be driven by variation in ethnicity, demographics, religion, ideology, education and myriad other factors.…”
Section: Network As Pipesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the range of the firm's network is contingent upon ties to qualitatively different partners (Koka et al, 2002) at different parts of the network. Improving stakeholder relations is stymied by the complexity and diversity of stakeholders in the network in terms of types, issues (Polsby, 1959;Wolfinger, 1960), identities (Rowley et al, 2003), power (informal vs. formal), ethnicity, beliefs, religion, political affiliations, education, and myriad other factors. Further, different stakeholders have different abilities to impact the firm (Eesley & Lenox, 2006;Mitchell et al, 1997).…”
Section: H1a Firms Whose Network Positions Bridge a Greater Number Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it was biased toward identifying persons who were more generalized leaders and thus would seem to favor identification of persons who have lived in the community for longer periods. Second, the reputational technique has been criticized by both pluralist (Polsby 1959) and radical scholars (Lukes 1974) as distorting the true picture of power in the local community. differential items that were intended to measure different aspects of a leader's attachment to his or her local community on a scale from one to seven.…”
Section: Selection Ofleadersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local community studies continued-or redefined-opinion leader researches, and by investigating local/community power and mapping relations among individuals/organizations (Dahl, 1958, Polsby 1959, 1962 for example) foresaw the social capital, embeddeddness and social network approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%