“…Moreover, the breakdown strength of ( x vol % TO NWs/TNA)–PVDF composites greatly improved in comparison with that of pure PVDF and TNA–PVDF composite (Figure S3), especially for the (5 vol % TO NWs/TNA)–PVDF composite, whose breakdown strength (513 MV/m) is nearly 1.5 times higher than that of the TNA–PVDF composite (330 MV/m). Similar results are further proved by the leakage current behavior of the ( x vol % TO NWs/TNA)–PVDF composites as shown in Figures d and S4. ,, The greatly improved breakdown strengths of ( x vol % TO NWs/TNA)–PVDF composites are contributed by the following reasons: (i) the uniform distribution of TO NWs in the upper layer acts as the scattering center of charges and obstacles in the process of electrical trees, leading to the increased tortuosity of the breakdown path and enhancement of breakdown strength. ,, It should be noted that the 5 vol % fraction is optimal in this study. Since 3 vol % is relatively low, it is less helpful to increase the curvature of breakdown path, resulting in lower breakdown strength, while for the (7 vol % TO NWs/TNA)–PVDF composite, the breakdown strength is greatly decreased owing to the aggregation of the TO NWs, which is in agreement with many previous reports. ,,, (ii) Due to the large dielectric contrast, the redistribution of the electric field that is mainly concentrated in the upper layer helps to protect the bottom layer from being premature breakdown at low electric field.…”