“…From eq and eq , it can be concluded that the energy density of dielectric materials can be improved collaboratively by increasing their E b (i.e., electric breakdown strength) and D or ε r . − However, it is a dilemma that ceramic and polymer dielectric materials do not attain high energy density because of inferior E b and ε r , respectively. − To solve this problem, polymers are coupled to ceramic nanofillers for realizing nanocomposite dielectrics. This technique garnered global emphasis due to its probable application in future flexible electronic devices. ,,− Till now, several high-functioning ferroelectric-type polymers, for example, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (i.e., PVDF), poly(vinylidene fluoride- co -hexafluoropropylene) (i.e., PVDF-HFP), and poly(vinylidene fluoride- co -chlorotrifluoroethylene) (i.e., PVDF-CTFE), and linear-type polymers like poly(etherimide) and poly(methyl methacrylate) have been utilized as polymer matrix materials. ,,,− Besides, various nanofillers, for instance, TiO 2 , SrTiO 3 , BaTiO 3 , and BN, to name some, are incorporated with the above-mentioned matrix materials to enhance the permittivity further and to some extent diverge the electric field treeing for realizing high energy density and efficient charge–discharge cycles. ,,, Further, the ferroelectric-type polymer nanocomposites usually show high permittivity but greater conductive losses and lower charge–discharge efficiency . On the other hand, linear-type polymer nanocomposites display the least losses but lower permittivity. , These limitations confine their sole use as energy storage materials for industrial applications without structural modifications.…”